SingleStore
Cloud-native relational database platform designed for real-time analytics and high-throughput transactional workloads at scale.
About this data
Updated June 29, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+6 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 39 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 17 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Community discussion around SingleStore over the recent period was modest in volume, with sentiment showing some improvement from prior weeks but still leaning cautious. Commenters raised bugs, reliability concerns, and competitor comparisons fairly often, with several mentions suggesting replacing SingleStore instances with alternatives like ClickHouse. On a more positive note, a few discussions praised integration possibilities and highlighted interest in expanding connector and test-suite support. Security and correctness issues surfaced in at least one thread as a notable concern among contributors.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How SingleStore compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Software.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 39 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 39 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“Sync Fails for SingleStore (using MySQL Driver). ### Describe the bug SingleStore used to work with the MySQL driver. In v57 sync fails on new tables when we execute a query for grants that's not supported by SingleStore: SHOW GRANTS FOR CURRENT_USER(); To Reproduce 1. Set up sin...”
“Hosted run link for Agentic-AI-Travel-Agent — send a route, get the itinerary back without the SingleStore + key setup. Hi @pavanbelagatti — I set up a hosted entry point for Agentic-AI-Travel-Agent so someone can hand it a trip and read the plan straight away, before they touch ...”
“How to keep this extension updated like other datasource extensions ?. Hello, I tried to use this extension to connect on Singlestore with an app using Quarkus 3.30.1CR1 But its latest version was built with Quarkus 3.27.1 Would be possible to do what has been done with other dat...”
“Singlestore BIGINT UNSIGNED columns returned incorrectly. #### What language are you using? **Python 3.10**. What version are you using? connectorx 0.4.5 What database are you using? Singlestore 5.7.32 What dataframe are you using? Pandas Can you describe your bug? Having a BIGIN...”
“[Bug]: Various db related issues. ### Apache Hop version? 2.17.0 Java version? openjdk 21.0.10 2026-01-20 LTS Operating system Linux What happened? While implementing and testing issue #6602 I noticed various issues: * The PostgreSQL driver doesn't know about its BYTEA data type ...”
38+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Bugs and reliability concerns dominated complaint-side discussion, with several mentions framing SingleStore as something to replace rather than build on.
- Sentiment recovered unevenly across the window, rising from a low opening through a mid-June peak before pulling back, suggesting instability rather than a steady turnaround.
- Opinion on integration was split, with some commenters pushing for broader connector support while others described migrating away from SingleStore entirely.
- Praise themes were present but thin, leaning on integration progress and feature interest rather than broad satisfaction with current functionality.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Feature requests | 3 |
| Performance | 3 |
| Strong features | 3 |
| New releases | 2 |
| Good integrations | 2 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 20 |
| Reliability | 7 |
| Missing features | 4 |
| Lacking integrations | 3 |
| Security praise | 3 |
Over the four-week window examined, public discussion around SingleStore was relatively sparse in volume, which means individual mentions carried outsized weight in shaping the overall tone. Commenters were most visibly focused on bugs and reliability concerns, which together represented the heaviest cluster of complaint themes. Several mentions framed SingleStore as a component being worked around or replaced rather than a central, trusted layer, with at least one discussion explicitly proposing a swap to a competing database and another referencing SingleStore as a legacy element left behind in a security configuration. That framing gave the complaint side of the conversation a quietly dismissive undertone beyond just functional criticism.
On the praise side, discussion was thinner but not absent. Integration-related positivity appeared in a couple of mentions, and there were signals of community-driven feature interest, including requests to extend connector support to SingleStore and efforts to fold it into shared infrastructure patterns. These threads suggested some commenters still see the product as worth investing in, though the enthusiasm felt cautious and conditional rather than enthusiastic.
The score trajectory told a choppy story. Sentiment opened the window at a low point in early April, climbed through mid-April when mention volume briefly spiked, then dipped again before a notable upward move through mid-June that briefly pushed into more positive territory. The most recent data point showed a pullback from that mid-June high, leaving the overall arc as a modest recovery with continued instability rather than a clean turnaround.
Opinion was divided most clearly around integration: some commenters were actively working to bring SingleStore into broader tooling ecosystems, while others described removing or bypassing it entirely. Security commentary was mixed too, appearing both as praise for the product's underlying model and as a source of concern when misconfigured rules associated with SingleStore deployments were flagged.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+6 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 39 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 17 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
SingleStore
40
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you SingleStore?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is SingleStore your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Mail Memories
Mail Memories is an email-based service that delivers users their past emails or memories on a scheduled basis.
Paid plans available
View DetailsLookAway
LookAway is a Mac app that reminds users to take regular breaks from their screen to reduce eye strain.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details