Back to Software
Atlassian logo

Atlassian

Atlassian provides team collaboration and productivity software including Jira, Confluence, and Trello for software and business teams.

Primary category: Software
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 29, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

37
Pulse Score

+12 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 145 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 4 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Discussion around Atlassian over the recent period was heavily complaint-driven, with bugs drawing by far the most mentions among commenters. Reports focused on authentication failures with MCP connectors, OAuth token issues, and reliability concerns, alongside widespread frustration over missing features and integration gaps. A smaller share of discussion offered praise for integration capabilities and specific features, and one commenter highlighted the value of a Confluence and Jira MCP interface for AI workflows. A security concern involving an exposed API token in a public repository also drew notable attention.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Most-discussed praise

Good integrations14
Strong features11
Feature requests9
Easy to use2
New releases2

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs78
Lacking integrations50
Missing features46
Feature requests27
Reliability21

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Atlassian compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Software.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 145 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub100% (145)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 145 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

Offer: Free MCP audit for mcp-atlassian. Hi! I have been using and following mcp-atlassian for a while - 5400+ stars is well-deserved. Having a proper MCP interface for Confluence and Jira is hugely valuable for AI agents that need to interact with project management and document...

GitHubJun 20, 2026

[BUG] [BUG] HTTP MCP connector to Atlassian /v1/mcp/authv2 fails with "Invalid context provided" while /v1/sse works with the same account. ### Preflight Checklist - [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet - [x] This is a single bug report (please fi...

GitHubJun 17, 2026

ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND on connecting remote mcp servers. Version: Claude_Desktop-1.12603.1-x86_64.AppImage When trying to connect a remote MCP server (e.g. atlassian) - which was configured via enterprise.json, I get in main.log:

GitHubJun 16, 2026

claude.ai PagerDuty connector: OAuth authorize rejected — PagerDuty returns "Invalid or missing value for redirect_uri" for https://claude.ai/api/mcp/auth_callback. ## MCP server URL or name claude.ai **PagerDuty** connector → https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp (PagerDuty MCP Server v...

GitHubJun 11, 2026

Security: exposed Atlassian API Token credential in .env copy.local. Heads up — found an exposed credential in ".env copy.local". An Atlassian API Token is committed to this repository's history and publicly visible. **Rotate this now.** The credential is in git history, so remov...

GitHubJun 15, 2026

277+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports and integration failures dominated the conversation and set a consistently negative overall tone.
  • Sentiment declined steeply from January into February then recovered partially before slipping again in the most recent week.
  • Opinion was divided between users who praised the integration approach and a larger group frustrated by reliability and missing features.
  • Rising mention volume in recent weeks appeared to amplify negative voices rather than signal a positive momentum shift.
Praise themeMentions
Good integrations14
Strong features11
Feature requests9
Easy to use2
New releases2
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs78
Lacking integrations50
Missing features46
Feature requests27
Reliability21

Public discussion around Atlassian over the recent four-week window was dominated overwhelmingly by frustration, with complaint-coded mentions far outnumbering praise. Bugs were by far the most cited theme, appearing in roughly half of all tracked mentions, and commenters frequently tied them to integration failures rather than isolated incidents. The tone across many threads was pointed and urgent, with several mentions describing authentication and connector issues in technical detail that suggested active, unresolved blockers rather than passing annoyances.

The score trajectory tells a story of a sharp early decline followed by a partial and unsteady recovery. Discussion suggested that sentiment bottomed out in late February, when scores dipped into the low twenties against a backdrop of growing mention volume. A modest rebound appeared by early June as community activity surged, but the most recent weeks show the score slipping again even as mentions climbed to their highest point in the window, which commenters would interpret as a sign that the influx of new voices skewed negative.

Integration complaints carried particular weight in the discourse. Several mentions described OAuth and MCP connector failures in specific terms, and the frustration in those threads read as compounding, with one reported issue apparently triggering related complaints from others. Reliability concerns appeared alongside these, reinforcing a tone of uncertainty about whether core workflows could be depended on.

Where opinion divided most clearly was around the product's underlying value proposition. A smaller but vocal group of commenters offered genuine praise for integration capability and expressed enthusiasm about MCP interfaces for AI agent workflows, with one mention calling the approach well-deserved of community attention. Feature requests appeared on both the praise and complaint sides, suggesting that some users remained engaged and hopeful while others framed missing features as evidence of neglect. Security-related discussion added a sharper edge to the overall tone in at least one thread.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
282
Mentions in selected period
145
Weeks in range
4
vs Software average (45)
Below by 8
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (145)

Compare with another tool

Atlassian

37

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Atlassian?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try Atlassian

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

LookAway logo

LookAway

74

LookAway is a Mac app that reminds users to take regular breaks from their screen to reduce eye strain.

Strong features
Feature requests

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details
FUTO Swipe logo

FUTO Swipe

68

A keyboard application for Android devices that provides swipe-based text input without sending user data to external servers.

Strong features
Pricing changes

Paid plans available

View Details