Atlassian
Atlassian provides team collaboration and productivity software including Jira, Confluence, and Trello for software and business teams.
About this data
Updated August 17, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
-6 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 186 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 11 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Recent discussion around Atlassian leaned heavily negative, with commenters focusing on privacy concerns related to data being used for AI model training, including frustration that users were opted in by default. Several mentions criticized the Rovo AI feature as unreliable and difficult to block. UI complaints and unfavorable comparisons to competitors like GitHub and YouTrack also appeared frequently, with some commenters expressing longstanding distrust of the company's product direction.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
In the news
Recent coverage from reputable tech publications, updated daily. Headlines and links only, shown for context and separate from the sentiment score.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Atlassian compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Software.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 186 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 186 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“My company is forcing me to use Bitbucket, no way move to Github and I do miss the Github cli.I don't know why Atlassian won't pay enough love for the CLI world? it forces you into using Rovo cli $$$$So, I built a framework that takes their OpenAPI file and wrap it as a cli, the ...”
“Offer: Free MCP audit for mcp-atlassian. Hi! I have been using and following mcp-atlassian for a while - 5400+ stars is well-deserved. Having a proper MCP interface for Confluence and Jira is hugely valuable for AI agents that need to interact with project management and document...”
“[BUG] [BUG] HTTP MCP connector to Atlassian /v1/mcp/authv2 fails with "Invalid context provided" while /v1/sse works with the same account. ### Preflight Checklist - [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet - [x] This is a single bug report (please fi...”
“claude.ai PagerDuty connector: OAuth authorize rejected — PagerDuty returns "Invalid or missing value for redirect_uri" for https://claude.ai/api/mcp/auth_callback. ## MCP server URL or name claude.ai **PagerDuty** connector → https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp (PagerDuty MCP Server v...”
“ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND on connecting remote mcp servers. Version: Claude_Desktop-1.12603.1-x86_64.AppImage When trying to connect a remote MCP server (e.g. atlassian) - which was configured via enterprise.json, I get in main.log:”
318+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Privacy concerns about default opt-in data sharing dominated discussion and drove a tone of distrust rather than simple product dissatisfaction.
- Sentiment trended downward across the window, with scores declining into the low range by early August despite brief low-volume fluctuations.
- Competitor comparisons were frequent, with commenters framing rivals as meaningfully preferable and describing Atlassian tools as having stagnated.
- Opinion on the Rovo AI feature was divided between sarcastic dismissal and deeper suspicion, with little positive reception evident.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Good integrations | 14 |
| Strong features | 11 |
| Feature requests | 9 |
| Easy to use | 2 |
| New releases | 2 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 82 |
| Lacking integrations | 50 |
| Missing features | 47 |
| Feature requests | 29 |
| Reliability | 22 |
Public discussion of Atlassian over the four-week window was heavily dominated by negative sentiment, with complaint themes accounting for virtually all of the thematic signal and no praise themes registering in the aggregated data. The loudest recurring concern among commenters centered on privacy, specifically around what several mentions described as Atlassian opting customers in by default to data sharing arrangements that could expose company intellectual property to model training pipelines. This thread carried a tone of alarm and distrust rather than mild frustration, with some commenters characterizing the behavior as intentional or predatory rather than careless.
The score trajectory over the period showed notable instability given the low mention volumes involved, but the directional story was one of erosion. After starting the window at a moderate level in late June, scores declined across most of the subsequent weeks, settling into the lower range by early August. A brief spike in one mid-period week appeared tied to very low mention volume and likely reflects noise rather than a genuine sentiment shift. The dominant end-of-window tone was clearly negative.
Competitor comparison was a significant secondary theme, with commenters frequently framing Atlassian tools as inferior or stagnant relative to alternatives. Discussion suggested that some users had already migrated away from products like Jira years ago and were now questioning whether to do the same with Confluence. The UI complaint theme reinforced this, with several mentions describing the product as having peaked some time ago and since accumulated changes that added friction without value.
Opinion was divided, though only modestly, around the AI-powered Rovo feature. A small cluster of mentions treated it with sarcastic amusement rather than outright rejection, suggesting some commenters found it more absurd than threatening. The security-adjacent mentions, though few, appeared in the context of skepticism rather than endorsement, complicating any reading of them as genuine praise.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
-6 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 186 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 11 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Atlassian
19
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Atlassian?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is Atlassian your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Mail Memories
Mail Memories is an email-based service that delivers users their past emails or memories on a scheduled basis.
Paid plans available
View DetailsLookAway
LookAway is a Mac app that reminds users to take regular breaks from their screen to reduce eye strain.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details