Back to Software
Atlassian logo

Atlassian

Atlassian provides team collaboration and productivity software including Jira, Confluence, and Trello for software and business teams.

Primary category: Software
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated August 17, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

19
Pulse Score

-6 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 186 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 11 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Recent discussion around Atlassian leaned heavily negative, with commenters focusing on privacy concerns related to data being used for AI model training, including frustration that users were opted in by default. Several mentions criticized the Rovo AI feature as unreliable and difficult to block. UI complaints and unfavorable comparisons to competitors like GitHub and YouTrack also appeared frequently, with some commenters expressing longstanding distrust of the company's product direction.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Most-discussed praise

Good integrations14
Strong features11
Feature requests9
Easy to use2
New releases2

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs82
Lacking integrations50
Missing features47
Feature requests29
Reliability22

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Atlassian compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Software.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 186 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub78% (145)
Hacker News22% (41)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 186 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

“My company is forcing me to use Bitbucket, no way move to Github and I do miss the Github cli.I don't know why Atlassian won't pay enough love for the CLI world? it forces you into using Rovo cli $$$$So, I built a framework that takes their OpenAPI file and wrap it as a cli, the ...”

Hacker NewsAug 12, 2026

“Offer: Free MCP audit for mcp-atlassian. Hi! I have been using and following mcp-atlassian for a while - 5400+ stars is well-deserved. Having a proper MCP interface for Confluence and Jira is hugely valuable for AI agents that need to interact with project management and document...”

GitHubJun 20, 2026

“[BUG] [BUG] HTTP MCP connector to Atlassian /v1/mcp/authv2 fails with "Invalid context provided" while /v1/sse works with the same account. ### Preflight Checklist - [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet - [x] This is a single bug report (please fi...”

GitHubJun 17, 2026

“claude.ai PagerDuty connector: OAuth authorize rejected — PagerDuty returns "Invalid or missing value for redirect_uri" for https://claude.ai/api/mcp/auth_callback. ## MCP server URL or name claude.ai **PagerDuty** connector → https://mcp.pagerduty.com/mcp (PagerDuty MCP Server v...”

GitHubJun 11, 2026

“ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND on connecting remote mcp servers. Version: Claude_Desktop-1.12603.1-x86_64.AppImage When trying to connect a remote MCP server (e.g. atlassian) - which was configured via enterprise.json, I get in main.log:”

GitHubJun 16, 2026

318+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Privacy concerns about default opt-in data sharing dominated discussion and drove a tone of distrust rather than simple product dissatisfaction.
  • Sentiment trended downward across the window, with scores declining into the low range by early August despite brief low-volume fluctuations.
  • Competitor comparisons were frequent, with commenters framing rivals as meaningfully preferable and describing Atlassian tools as having stagnated.
  • Opinion on the Rovo AI feature was divided between sarcastic dismissal and deeper suspicion, with little positive reception evident.
Praise themeMentions
Good integrations14
Strong features11
Feature requests9
Easy to use2
New releases2
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs82
Lacking integrations50
Missing features47
Feature requests29
Reliability22

Public discussion of Atlassian over the four-week window was heavily dominated by negative sentiment, with complaint themes accounting for virtually all of the thematic signal and no praise themes registering in the aggregated data. The loudest recurring concern among commenters centered on privacy, specifically around what several mentions described as Atlassian opting customers in by default to data sharing arrangements that could expose company intellectual property to model training pipelines. This thread carried a tone of alarm and distrust rather than mild frustration, with some commenters characterizing the behavior as intentional or predatory rather than careless.

The score trajectory over the period showed notable instability given the low mention volumes involved, but the directional story was one of erosion. After starting the window at a moderate level in late June, scores declined across most of the subsequent weeks, settling into the lower range by early August. A brief spike in one mid-period week appeared tied to very low mention volume and likely reflects noise rather than a genuine sentiment shift. The dominant end-of-window tone was clearly negative.

Competitor comparison was a significant secondary theme, with commenters frequently framing Atlassian tools as inferior or stagnant relative to alternatives. Discussion suggested that some users had already migrated away from products like Jira years ago and were now questioning whether to do the same with Confluence. The UI complaint theme reinforced this, with several mentions describing the product as having peaked some time ago and since accumulated changes that added friction without value.

Opinion was divided, though only modestly, around the AI-powered Rovo feature. A small cluster of mentions treated it with sarcastic amusement rather than outright rejection, suggesting some commenters found it more absurd than threatening. The security-adjacent mentions, though few, appeared in the context of skepticism rather than endorsement, complicating any reading of them as genuine praise.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
323
Mentions in selected period
186
Weeks in range
11
vs Software average (45)
Below by 26
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (145), Hacker News (41)

Compare with another tool

Atlassian

19

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Atlassian?

Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.

Explore the enterprise dashboard

Try Atlassian

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Is Atlassian your product?

See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.

Request early access

Compare with similar tools

Mail Memories logo

Mail Memories

77

Mail Memories is an email-based service that delivers users their past emails or memories on a scheduled basis.

Strong features
Limited data

Paid plans available

View Details
LookAway logo

LookAway

74

LookAway is a Mac app that reminds users to take regular breaks from their screen to reduce eye strain.

Strong features
Feature requests

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details