Back to security
Zscaler logo

Zscaler

Cloud-based security platform that provides zero trust network access and internet security for enterprise organizations.

Primary category: security
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 22, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

29
Pulse Score

-3 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 63 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 12 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

This week in public discussion

Over the recent four-week period, community discussion around Zscaler was heavily dominated by negative sentiment, with commenters frequently describing bugs and reliability problems. Several mentions highlighted TLS and SSL certificate failures in corporate environments, with developers reporting that Zscaler's SSL inspection broke connections in Docker, CLI tools, and model downloads. A version lag complaint also surfaced, with users noting that the Zscaler MCP server in Claude.ai appeared significantly out of date. Overall tone across mentions was sharply critical, with little visible praise recorded.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

PositiveMixedNeutralNegative

Most-discussed praise

Strong features2
Compared to rivals1
Pricing too high1
Feature requests1
Lacking integrations1

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs45
Lacking integrations27
Reliability22
Missing features7
Poor support2

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 63 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

[BUG] Hosted MCP OAuth initiation ignores NODE_EXTRA_CA_CERTS on corporate MITM networks (v2.1.113+). ### Bug description On corporate networks that intercept TLS with a custom root CA (Zscaler, Netskope, device-level CA, etc.), triggering OAuth for hosted MCP servers (gmail, gca...

githubMay 3, 2026

Netherlands country drift in location resource. Community Note - Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request - Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new informa...

githubApr 14, 2026

[Bug]: pw:client-certificates: "Invalid IPv6 token" when corporate transparent proxy presents cert with IPv4 SAN. ### Version 1.60.0 Steps to reproduce Environment: Playwright Java (same behavior expected in other bindings) Machine is connected to a corporate network with a trans...

github2 days ago

failin always with timeout. ### Before opening, please confirm: - [x] I have searched for duplicate or closed issues Operating System win32 Kiro Version 1.0.0 Bug Description Something went wrong: [Error] Failed to establish a socket connection to proxies: PROXY 194.9.107.65:1082...

github3 days ago

Not robust to corporate SSL inspection on Python 3.13+: VERIFY_X509_STRICT breaks multiple outbound TLS paths; CA bundle is insufficient. ### Summary Behind a corporate TLS-inspection proxy (e.g. Zscaler) on Python 3.13, headroom cannot reach the network on multiple independent p...

github3 days ago

85+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports dominated discussion, centering almost entirely on TLS and SSL certificate failures in corporate network environments.
  • Sentiment followed a volatile but mostly low trajectory, with a brief mid-period uptick that faded as mention volume grew.
  • Opinion was divided between users framing issues as product defects and those treating them as integration or configuration challenges.
  • A version lag complaint in an AI platform connector added a reliability dimension that broadened frustration beyond core network behavior.
Praise themeMentions
Strong features2
Compared to rivals1
Pricing too high1
Feature requests1
Lacking integrations1
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs45
Lacking integrations27
Reliability22
Missing features7
Poor support2

Public discussion of Zscaler over the recent four-week window was heavily weighted toward frustration, with bugs emerging as the dominant theme by a wide margin. Commenters across multiple threads described TLS interception failures, SSL certificate validation errors, and certificate chain breakdowns in corporate network environments. The tone in these mentions was consistently exasperated, with several describing scenarios where developer tooling, CLI authentication flows, and application downloads were blocked or broken specifically because of how Zscaler handles traffic inspection. Integration gaps were the second most prominent complaint, with discussion suggesting that the product's behavior in mixed environments, including Docker setups, cloud CLIs, and AI tooling, created friction that users felt should have been addressed.

The score trajectory tells a story of modest volatility around a persistently low baseline. An early low point gave way to a brief climb that peaked in early May, which appeared to coincide with a lighter volume of mentions. As mention counts rose again through late May and into June, sentiment pulled back and settled into a narrow, tepid range. The most recent two data points show a slight upward nudge, though discussion volume was thin enough that this recovery should be read cautiously.

One notable area of divided opinion was whether the problems commenters described reflected product defects or the inherent complexity of deploying a deep inspection layer in heterogeneous environments. Some mentions framed issues as bugs requiring a fix, while others read more like integration guidance requests, suggesting a split between users who expected out-of-the-box compatibility and those treating the friction as a configuration challenge.

A single mention touching on version lag in an AI connector drew attention to what commenters framed as a gap between current release state and what was actually deployed in third-party platforms, adding a reliability-adjacent concern to the mix. The overall tone across the window was one of low-grade but persistent dissatisfaction.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
90
Mentions in selected period
63
Weeks in range
12
Pricing
Custom pricing
Sources
GitHub (63)

Compare with another tool

Zscaler

29

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Zscaler?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try Zscaler

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

FortiGate logo

FortiGate

71

A network firewall and security appliance by Fortinet serving enterprise, service provider, and government organizations worldwide.

Strong features
Poor support

Custom pricing

View Details
Cybereason logo

Cybereason

69

Endpoint security platform providing threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities through a single lightweight agent for businesses.

Strong features
Feels slow

Custom pricing

View Details