Back to Design
LottieFiles logo

LottieFiles

LottieFiles is a platform for designers and developers to create, edit, and share Lottie animations for web and mobile applications.

Primary category: Design
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 29, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

58
Pulse Score

+24 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 28 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 11 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Recent discussion around LottieFiles was notably positive, with commenters frequently highlighting smooth integration into projects built with Flutter, Svelte, Rails, and React. Several mentions praised the ease of dropping Lottie animations into loading screens and onboarding flows, with developers describing the process as straightforward. One negative thread stood out, with a user reporting a native library crash on Android 12 devices. Overall community sentiment trended upward compared to the prior period.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.

Most-discussed praise

Good integrations9
Strong features8
Easy to use7
Feature requests5
Polished UI2

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs11
Reliability10
Mobile app8
Performance1
Compared to rivals1

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How LottieFiles compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Design.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 28 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub100% (28)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 28 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

DotLottieAnimation consumes pointer events when stateMachineId is null. ### Summary DotLottieAnimation (Compose) consumes all pointer events even when no stateMachineId is set, this makes it impossible to interact with components placed under the animation, since no events ever r...

GitHubMay 22, 2026

Socket Security Obfuscated Code. ## Package - [x] @lottiefiles/dotlottie-web (core) - [x] @lottiefiles/dotlottie-react - [ ] @lottiefiles/dotlottie-vue - [ ] @lottiefiles/dotlottie-svelte - [ ] @lottiefiles/dotlottie-solid - [ ] @lottiefiles/dotlottie-wc Description On one of my ...

GitHubMay 14, 2026

Blank canvas / silent failure when multiple instances mount concurrently in iOS WKWebView (v0.60.0). Environment | Item | Value | |------|-------| | @lottiefiles/dotlottie-react | ^0.17.12 | | @lottiefiles/dotlottie-web (transitive) | 0.60.0 | | Framework | Next.js 15.5 + React 1...

GitHubApr 17, 2026

[Bug] WebAssembly.instantiateStreaming rejected by iOS WKWebView causes "WASM loading failed from all sources" in 0.72.0. ## Summary In iOS WKWebView (embedded in a native host app, with vConsole attached for debugging), @lottiefiles/dotlottie-web@0.72.0 fails to initialize becau...

GitHubMay 7, 2026

Screen revisit crash (iOS EXC_BAD_ACCESS) and silent render failure (Android) — New Architecture. ## Summary When navigating **away** from a screen containing a DotLottie component and then **back** to it: - **iOS**: App crashes with EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0xbeaddece8888...

GitHubMay 21, 2026

249+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Integration and ease of use dominated discussion, with most mentions treating LottieFiles as a default dependency rather than a deliberate choice.
  • Sentiment trended upward across the four-week window, recovering from a low baseline in late April to a notably higher level by late June despite mid-period dips.
  • Opinion was divided on mobile reliability, as strong general praise coexisted with at least one pointed report of crashes tied to a missing native library on Android.
  • A portion of commenters framed the product aspirationally, describing it as a foundation for animated UI systems rather than a standalone finished tool.
Praise themeMentions
Good integrations9
Strong features8
Easy to use7
Feature requests5
Polished UI2
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs11
Reliability10
Mobile app8
Performance1
Compared to rivals1

Public discussion around LottieFiles over the past four weeks was dominated by a strong theme of integration, with the majority of mentions reflecting enthusiasm about how readily the tool slots into broader development workflows. Commenters across multiple languages and project contexts framed LottieFiles as a natural dependency when building loading screens, onboarding animations, and UI components, suggesting the product occupies a comfortable default position in many developers' toolchains. Ease of use was a recurring undercurrent, with several mentions treating adoption as a low-friction step rather than a deliberate architectural decision.

The score trajectory over the window was notably volatile but trended upward overall. Discussion began at a low-sentiment baseline in late April, climbed steeply through mid-May as mention volume increased, then dipped before recovering to a high point in early June. A subsequent pullback in mid-June gave way to a partial recovery by late June, leaving the overall period score meaningfully higher than where it started. The pattern suggests sentiment is responsive to specific integration experiences rather than reflecting a stable, settled opinion of the product.

Complaint themes were sparse relative to praise, but the mentions that did surface pointed to reliability and mobile-platform concerns. One commenter specifically flagged a native library loading failure on Android, with the tone of the report implying frustration at crashes affecting real users on common hardware. This stood out as a point of divided opinion: while most discussion treated the product as dependable scaffolding, that single technical concern introduced doubt about consistency on mobile.

Feature requests and forward-looking comments appeared alongside praise, with some commenters framing LottieFiles resources as a building block for more ambitious skinning or animated character systems. This layer of aspirational discussion suggested a subset of users sees the product as a foundation for creative tooling rather than a finished utility, which colored overall sentiment with a constructive rather than critical tone.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
254
Mentions in selected period
28
Weeks in range
11
vs Design average (56)
Above by 2
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (28)

Compare with another tool

LottieFiles

58

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you LottieFiles?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try LottieFiles

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

TikZ Editor logo

TikZ Editor

66

A browser-based editor for creating and previewing TikZ diagrams, serving LaTeX users and technical document authors.

Strong features
Bugs

Free

View Details
Canva logo

Canva

64

Canva is a web-based graphic design platform serving individuals and teams who create visual content.

Easy to use
UI frustrations

Free / Pro from $15/mo

View Details