Back to Communication
Aircall logo

Aircall

Cloud-based business phone system that lets sales and support teams make, receive, and manage calls from any device.

Primary category: Communication
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated May 25, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

33
Pulse Score

+7 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 4 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 3 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Over the recent period, community discussion around Aircall was limited in volume but skewed heavily negative in tone. Commenters raised repeated complaints about bugs, including stale cached data, broken pagination, and a category name error preventing app installation, alongside concerns about missing incremental sync and integration gaps. One notable positive mention came from a developer who cited Aircall's HMAC-SHA1 webhook signature verification approvingly as a security reference point. Overall sentiment remained low, with technical frustrations dominating the conversation.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Most-discussed praise

Security praise1

Most-discussed complaints

Missing features3
Bugs2
Lacking integrations2
Feature requests1

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Aircall compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Communication.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 4 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub100% (4)

Sample public mentions

Showing 4 of 4 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

[source-aircall] Calls stream in the Aircall connector doesn't currently have incremental sync configured.. ### Connector Name Aircall Connector Version 0.4.7 What step the error happened? During the sync Relevant information Hi, Could you please configure incremental_sync for ca...

GitHubApr 21, 2026

Aircall. ### App Aircall Summary: Aircall MCP can only get 1st 20 records and cannot process after that Details: What’s happening 1) Aircall defaults to 20 per page Aircall’s API pagination docs explicitly say per_page default is 20 (min 1, max 50). So any request like GET /v1/ca...

GitHubFeb 20, 2026

[BUG] Aircall MCP - Get Calls returns stale/cached data, ignores query parameters. Describe the bug The Aircall MCP integration's "Get Call" action, when used to list calls (GET /v1/calls), returns stale cached data instead of current data. It ignores all query parameters includi...

GitHubFeb 16, 2026

Lead-Audit · Twilio-Inbound-Webhook ohne Signature-Verify. ## Befund /api/webhooks/twilio/inbound/route.ts (610 Zeilen) verifiziert KEIN X-Twilio-Signature — Webhook ist Spoofing-fähig. Aircall macht es richtig (HMAC-SHA1). Vorlage existiert in /api/twilio/inbound-kb-whatsapp/rou...

GitHubMay 20, 2026

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports and missing or limited features dominated the complaint discussion across the window.
  • Sentiment trended sharply downward after an early high point and has only partially recovered near the end of the period.
  • The single positive mention was an indirect security comparison rather than direct enthusiasm for the product.
  • Opinion was not strongly divided, with critical voices largely going unchallenged in the available discussion.
Praise themeMentions
Security praise1
Complaint themeMentions
Missing features3
Bugs2
Lacking integrations2
Feature requests1

Public discussion about Aircall over the reviewed multi-week window was sparse but consistently leaning negative, with complaint themes heavily outweighing praise. Bugs and missing features each drew the most attention, followed closely by integration concerns, painting a picture of a product that commenters felt was falling short on functional reliability and ecosystem depth. The lone positive signal came from a security-related mention, where a commenter cited Aircall's HMAC-SHA1 webhook signature verification approvingly, using it as a benchmark against a competing implementation. That isolated praise, however, did little to counterbalance the weight of frustration elsewhere in the discussion.

The score trajectory showed notable volatility across the window rather than a clean directional trend. Sentiment opened relatively high, dropped sharply and held low for an extended stretch, then briefly recovered before sinking again to its lowest point in the dataset. The most recent data points suggested a partial rebound, though the current pulse score remains well below where the window began, indicating that any recovery has been modest and tentative at best. Commenters did not appear to be warming back to the product so much as reacting unevenly to isolated topics.

The complaint discussion was dominated by technical dysfunction and perceived gaps. Several mentions pointed to integration and connector issues, including problems with incremental sync configuration and pagination handling that left users unable to process full datasets. Stale or cached data being returned while query parameters were ignored was another point of frustration that surfaced. Separate from performance issues, discussion also touched on categorization and inventory management errors, suggesting that operational or setup friction added to the negative tone.

Opinion was not sharply divided so much as simply imbalanced. There was little pushback against the critical voices, and the security praise existed in a context that was not really about Aircall at all, making it an indirect endorsement rather than enthusiastic advocacy.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
14
Mentions in selected period
4
Weeks in range
3
vs Communication average (41)
Below by 8
Pricing
Paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (4)

Compare with another tool

Aircall

33

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Aircall?

Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.

Explore the enterprise dashboard

Try Aircall

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Is Aircall your product?

See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.

Request early access

Compare with similar tools

Bramble logo

Bramble

71

A virtual video chat platform for remote teams and event attendees to hold informal social gatherings online.

Strong features
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details
Tidio logo

Tidio

61

Tidio is a customer communication platform combining live chat, chatbots, and AI tools for small and medium businesses.

Strong features
Downtime

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details