Wasp
Wasp is an open-source framework for building full-stack web applications with React, Node.js, and Prisma, aimed at developers.
About this data
Updated June 29, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
-11 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 35 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 13 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Community discussion around Wasp over the recent period leaned negative, with commenters raising repeated concerns about bugs and reliability issues. Several mentions pointed to problems with file extension handling breaking generated server builds in newer versions, drawing notable frustration. A small number of excerpts offered neutral or constructive notes around documentation updates and tooling improvements, and one commenter expressed a positive take on npm publishing efforts. Overall, complaints outnumbered praise by a wide margin in the tracked window.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Wasp compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 35 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 35 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“TS spec: ref({ from }) should normalize import paths that include a file extension. ## Summary ref({ from }) in the TS spec should accept module paths that include a file extension (.ts/.tsx/.js/.jsx/.mts/...) and normalize them, rather than emitting the extension verbatim into g...”
“Operation/page refs keep file extension, breaking generated server tsc on Wasp 0.25 (TS5097). ## Summary fileBased builds operation/page refs from absolute file paths that **retain the file extension** (.ts/.tsx). Wasp expects extensionless imports, so under Wasp **0.25** the gen...”
“As a userland Spec library, how do I get the spec package in development?. - Found while working on #4309 - Could be solved by https://github.com/wasp-lang/wasp/issues/4328 While developing a userland Spec library, it is useful to do so in isolation of an actual Wasp project (les...”
“SDK build OOMs during Wasp 0.24 upgrade when app contains a large Mastra server runtime. **Describe the bug** We are upgrading a private OpenSaaS-derived Wasp app to Wasp 0.24.0. The app contains a large Mastra-based server-side TypeScript runtime inside the Wasp project source t...”
“Fix our docs search. Algolia. Our old index up there is now empty. I ran old crawler, crawled nothing. It points to wasp-lang.dev though. Maybe worth adding new domain up there, wasp.sh, and crawler for wasp.sh/docs? Or there is deeper issue with algolia setup.”
30+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Bug reports and reliability complaints dominated discussion by a wide margin over the four-week window.
- Sentiment trended downward through mid-June before a partial and uncertain recovery in the final week.
- Opinion was divided between a small group of constructive or optimistic commenters and a larger cluster focused on breakage and missing features.
- Much of the discussion carried a contributor or developer-infrastructure tone, suggesting active internal friction alongside user-facing concerns.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Feature requests | 3 |
| Strong features | 3 |
| Good integrations | 2 |
| Polished UI | 1 |
| New releases | 1 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 7 |
| Reliability | 5 |
| Feature requests | 3 |
| Missing features | 3 |
| Lacking integrations | 2 |
Public discussion around Wasp over the past four weeks has been dominated by bug reports and reliability concerns, with complaint-side themes outnumbering praise themes by a wide margin across a relatively modest volume of 16 total mentions. Commenters raised repeated issues around broken or inconsistent behavior, and several mentions pointed specifically to generated code problems and import path handling that broke downstream builds. The tone in these threads leaned frustrated rather than exploratory, suggesting users were encountering friction during active development work rather than casual evaluation.
The score trajectory tells a story of mild but meaningful turbulence. Sentiment opened the window in a middling range, dipped through mid-May, recovered slightly in early June, then fell noticeably in the week of June 8th before partially rebounding. The sharpest drop coincided with the heaviest concentration of mentions, which suggests a cluster of complaints arrived together and weighed on overall tone during that period. The most recent data point shows a partial recovery, though it rests on very low mention volume, so the rebound may not reflect a stable shift.
Feature gap sentiment was a secondary but consistent thread. Discussion suggested users were bumping up against missing integrations and absent capabilities, and several mentions framed these as blocking issues rather than nice-to-haves. There was also a notable current of internal or contributor-facing discussion around tooling, dependency management, and platform support, which gave some of the conversation a developer-infrastructure flavor distinct from typical end-user feedback.
Opinion was most divided on the product's trajectory. A handful of mentions reflected constructive engagement and optimism about the direction, including praise for ease of use and one positive integration note. But those voices were clearly outnumbered by bug-focused complaints, leaving the overall tone cautious and mixed rather than confidently positive or sharply negative.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
-11 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 35 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 13 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Wasp
39
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Wasp?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is Wasp your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Safari MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants programmatic access to Safari browser automation for developers.
Free
View DetailsBubble
No-code platform that lets users design, build, and deploy full-stack web applications without writing code.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details