Spacelift
Spacelift is a policy-driven infrastructure orchestration platform serving DevOps and platform engineering teams managing infrastructure as code workflows.
About this data
Updated June 15, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+21 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 23 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 10 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Over the recent period, online discussion around Spacelift was modest in volume but leaned cautiously positive, with commenters frequently drawing comparisons to competitors and noting integration capabilities alongside feature highlights like DAG-based stack orchestration and Terragrunt support. Some mentions praised workflow usability improvements as meaningful additions for adoption. A small number of voices flagged a bug around a missing Terragrunt schema property and noted gaps in certain features, keeping overall sentiment mixed rather than enthusiastic.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 23 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“[FEATURE] Download tfplan command. ## Feature Description Add the ability to download the binary plan file (.tfplan) from a completed Spacelift run via spacectl. Problem Statement When Spacelift executes a plan, the binary plan artifact is not accessible to users. The only way to...”
“[Feature]: Provider Whitelist Support. Would it be possible to somehow enforce provider whitelisting? For example, in one of the first sessions I was testing with, I had the following providers come up. 1. hashicorp/aws v6.42.0 2. kuwas/github v4.3.0 3. integrations/github v6.6.0...”
“bug: missing property 'prefix_resource_names_with_module_path' in terragrunt nested schema in spacelift_stack. Currently there's no way to set to true the Prefix resource names with module path flag for a Terragrunt stack. IIRC this was set as default to true, but now seems to be...”
“Workspace Autodiscovery Bugs and Feature Requests. First off, thank you for implementing this feature! I'm really excited to start using it more. In my testing I found a few issues, let me know if I'm misunderstanding anything here. -Cheers 1. Backfill/Provision Existing Folders ...”
“coralogix_alerts_scheduler: monthly recurring schedule fails with "can't unmarshal into *int64, needs FromTerraform5Value method". Affected Resource(s) * coralogix_alerts_scheduler — only when schedule.recurring.dynamic.frequency.monthly is used. weekly, daily, and one_time sched...”
24+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Competitor comparisons against the shifting Terraform and OpenTofu landscape dominated positive discussion and gave the conversation much of its optimistic framing.
- Sentiment followed a volatile but broadly upward path over the four-week window, with the most recent weeks showing the highest scores after a sharp mid-window dip.
- Opinion was most divided around feature completeness, with Terragrunt schema gaps and missing configuration options drawing pointed criticism alongside broader feature praise.
- A technically engaged audience tracking roadmap milestones closely means sentiment can shift quickly depending on whether specific capabilities arrive on schedule.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Compared to rivals | 3 |
| Good integrations | 2 |
| Strong features | 2 |
| Missing features | 1 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 10 |
| Reliability | 5 |
| Missing features | 4 |
| Feature requests | 1 |
| UI frustrations | 1 |
Discussion around Spacelift over the past four weeks was modest in volume but notable for the thematic weight carried by competitor comparisons. The most frequently appearing praise theme centered on how Spacelift stacks up against alternatives, with several mentions framing the product favorably in the context of the broader infrastructure-as-code landscape, particularly around the ongoing HashiCorp licensing shift and the rise of OpenTofu. Commenters appeared to see Spacelift as a relevant player in a reorganizing ecosystem, and that framing lent a degree of ambient optimism to the conversation even when specific product details were not the focus.
The score trajectory over recent weeks was volatile rather than linear. Sentiment opened at a low point in mid-April, climbed modestly through late April, then dropped sharply before recovering through May into early June, where it reached its highest recorded points in the window. The final available data point pulled back slightly, suggesting the recovery may not yet be stable. The overall directional read across the window is cautiously upward, with the current score meaningfully higher than where the window began, but the jagged path makes a confident bullish read difficult.
Integration quality and specific feature praise contributed positive signal, with discussion suggesting that certain workflow capabilities were drawing genuine appreciation. On the other side, a bug report around a missing Terragrunt schema property drew attention, and at least one thread flagged a missing feature, pointing to gaps that some commenters found frustrating in an otherwise favorably regarded product.
Opinion appeared divided most clearly around feature completeness. Some commenters oriented their remarks around what the product does well in context, while others surfaced concrete gaps, particularly around Terragrunt configuration support. The DAG orchestration and monorepo workflow themes in the sample mentions suggest that power users are tracking a fairly technical roadmap closely, and their sentiment tends to swing on whether specific milestones land as expected.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+21 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 23 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 10 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Spacelift
52
Koala AI
81
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Spacelift?
If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.
Share feedbackAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Compare with similar tools
RevenueCat
A platform that manages in-app purchases, subscriptions, and revenue analytics for iOS and Android app developers.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsCodemirror
An open-source JavaScript code editor component for browsers, used by developers building web-based text and code editing interfaces.
Free
View Details