Back to Coding
Jenkins logo

Jenkins

Jenkins is an open-source automation server that helps development teams build, test, and deploy software through continuous integration pipelines.

Primary category: Coding
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 29, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

34
Pulse Score

-4 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 547 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 20 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Discussion around Jenkins over the recent period leaned heavily negative, with commenters raising bugs and reliability concerns accounting for the large majority of mentions. Several users flagged failing Jenkins jobs disrupting downstream workflows, UI layout problems, and gaps in CI infrastructure. A smaller number of mentions praised specific plugins and integrations, and a few feature requests pointed to interest in reduced infrastructure dependencies. Overall community sentiment appeared to soften further compared to the prior period.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Most-discussed praise

Strong features16
Feature requests13
Good integrations12
Reliability6
New releases4

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs327
Reliability218
UI frustrations53
Missing features38
Feature requests32

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Jenkins compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 547 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub100% (547)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 547 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

Missing path normalization leads to 301 Moved Permanently from vault for v1 secrets. ### Jenkins and plugins versions report Environment What Operating System are you using (both controller, and any agents involved in the problem)? Linux Reproduction steps withVault calls with en...

GitHubFeb 3, 2026

Jenkins jfrog plugin stops working with error about encryption key file when multiple agents are used. ### Describe the bug This (closed) bug only partially addressed the issue ( https://github.com/jenkinsci/jfrog-plugin/issues/59 ). When multiple agents are used, the use of the ...

GitHubFeb 20, 2026

Provide all new C8i, M8i, and R8i instance types capable of nested virtualization. ### What feature do you want to see added? Since February 16th, new C8i, M8i, and R8i instances capable of nested virtualization are available. Previously, only costly bare metal instances were ava...

GitHubFeb 21, 2026

The latest release is missing from the Jenkins update site. I build a Jenkins docker image with the plugins included. As of Feb 2 it looks like a new release of this plugin was added but the hpi file is not found when using jenkins-plugin-cli --plugin-file /usr/share/jenkins/ref/...

GitHubFeb 3, 2026

Cannot pass mbt build by using latest version 1.2.43. Please provide the following info: - MBT Version: 1.2.43 - OS Version: docker image devxci/mbtci-java21-node22 - If possible, provide a link to the project: SAP internal project, if need please contact me then Steps to Reprodu...

GitHubFeb 13, 2026

2,687+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bugs and reliability complaints dominated discussion by a wide margin, shaping an overall tone of accumulated frustration.
  • Sentiment trended downward across the four-week window, with a brief mid-period recovery erased as mention volume surged in the final weeks.
  • Opinion was divided on whether Jenkins fits comfortably into modern infrastructure patterns, with integration and standalone-use concerns splitting commenters.
  • Positive sentiment existed but was sparse and heavily outweighed, leaving praise themes with minimal influence on the overall tone.
Praise themeMentions
Strong features16
Feature requests13
Good integrations12
Reliability6
New releases4
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs327
Reliability218
UI frustrations53
Missing features38
Feature requests32

Public discussion around Jenkins over the past four weeks was heavily weighted toward frustration, with bugs and reliability concerns accounting for the vast majority of complaint-coded mentions. Commenters frequently surfaced pipeline failures, broken job executions, and infrastructure-dependent behaviors that were not working as expected. Several mentions described CI jobs outright failing to produce outputs, such as container images not being pushed or cluster provisioning tests silently dropping out of execution. The overall tone in this space was one of accumulated fatigue rather than acute outrage, suggesting these are problems discussants have been living with for some time.

The score trajectory tells a story of modest recovery followed by a renewed slide. After bottoming out in mid-April, sentiment climbed through early and mid-May before pulling back sharply in late May. A partial rebound appeared in early June, but the highest-volume period of the window, the final two weeks, saw scores drop again as mention volume surged. The pattern suggests that when broader audiences engaged, the balance of opinion tilted negative, diluting whatever goodwill had accumulated during quieter stretches.

Praise themes were present but thin. A handful of commenters offered positive notes around specific features or integrations, and there were a small number of requests that framed the product approvingly as a starting point worth extending. The standalone-version request, for instance, was phrased in language that acknowledged the core tool favorably while pushing for reduced infrastructure dependency.

Opinion was most divided around the product's role in modern CI-CD workflows. Some discussants appeared content working within its existing model, while others signaled through feature requests and integration complaints that they viewed the current setup as misaligned with where infrastructure practices are heading. UI complaints added a lower-intensity but persistent undercurrent of dissatisfaction that ran alongside the louder reliability concerns.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
2,692
Mentions in selected period
547
Weeks in range
20
vs Coding average (46)
Below by 12
Pricing
Free
Sources
GitHub (547)

Compare with another tool

Jenkins

34

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Jenkins?

Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.

Explore the enterprise dashboard

Try Jenkins

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Is Jenkins your product?

See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.

Request early access

Compare with similar tools

Safari MCP Server logo

Safari MCP Server

84

A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants programmatic access to Safari browser automation for developers.

Strong features
Limited data

Free

View Details
Bubble logo

Bubble

75

No-code platform that lets users design, build, and deploy full-stack web applications without writing code.

Strong features
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details