Back to Coding
Hasura logo

Hasura

Hasura is a GraphQL engine that instantly generates APIs over new or existing databases for developers and teams.

Primary category: Coding
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated July 13, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

30
Pulse Score

-3 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 54 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 7 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Recent discussion around Hasura skewed heavily negative, with bugs dominating the conversation across the period. Commenters repeatedly flagged specific issues including a missing CLI plugin blocking connector upgrades, errors tied to UBI base images, and session state leaking across Postgres requests. A handful of mentions touched on privacy and performance concerns as well. Praise was sparse, with only a few references to integration and ease of use offering any positive notes amid the broader frustration.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Most-discussed praise

Good integrations2
Strong features2
Easy to use1

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs38
Reliability20
Missing features6
Performance4
Lacking integrations3

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Hasura compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 54 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub98% (53)
Hacker News2% (1)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 54 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

“feat: app-level certificate template defaults with program overrides. ### Summary Attendance (and achievement) certificate generation fails when a new Program (semester) has no rows in CertificateTemplateProgram, even though CertificateTemplateText templates exist and the program...”

GitHubMay 20, 2026

“[BUG] postgres DBM explain_parameterized_queries fails on customer queries with untyped parameters. **Agent**: 7.78.3 and 7.78.4 **Helm chart**: 3.213.2 **Postgres integration**: 23.7.0 (bundled with 7.78.3) **Driver**: psycopg3 (error class is psycopg.errors.*, no "2") **Deploym...”

GitHubMay 18, 2026

“ndc-mongodb v2.0.x CLI plugin missing from cli-plugins-index — ddn connector upgrade / plugins install / introspect all fail. **Summary:** The ndc-mongodb **v2.0.0/v2.0.1 connector** is published (appears in ddn connector list; per-platform binaries + connector-definition.tgz are...”

GitHubJun 26, 2026

“hasura v2.49.3 seed create does not work if base image is ubi (Error: pg_dump: undefined symbol: PQmblenBounded). If your hasura graphql engine server is using hasura/graphql-engine:v2.49.3-ce.cli-migrations-v3.ubi or any ubi image you will get error message: Version Information ...”

GitHubJun 26, 2026

“run_sql with no_transaction: true mis-splits dollar-quoted ($$) PL/pgSQL blocks. ### Version Information Server Version: v2.48.5 CLI Version (for CLI related issue): n/a Environment OSS What is the current behaviour? When run_sql is called with no_transaction: true, the server sp...”

GitHubJun 26, 2026

730+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports dominated the conversation and set a frustrated, technically detailed tone throughout the window.
  • Sentiment dipped in mid-June before partially recovering, but the overall trajectory remained low and unstable.
  • Security and privacy themes drew divided reactions, appearing as concerns rather than clear praise in discussion.
  • Positive mentions were few and scattered, mostly tied to integration potential and early-stage project setup enthusiasm.
Praise themeMentions
Good integrations2
Strong features2
Easy to use1
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs38
Reliability20
Missing features6
Performance4
Lacking integrations3

Discussion of Hasura across the four-week window was dominated by a heavy volume of bug reports, which accounted for the largest share of complaint themes by a wide margin. Commenters surfaced specific, technical grievances including a missing CLI plugin blocking connector upgrades, a UBI image incompatibility causing seed failures, a dollar-quoted PL/pgSQL parsing error in run_sql, and a session state leak across requests. The tone in these threads was largely frustrated and procedural, with users presenting version details and reproduction steps in a way that suggested unresolved friction rather than isolated edge cases. The sheer concentration of bug-related mentions gave the overall conversation a negative center of gravity.

Sentiment scores moved in an uneven pattern over the window. The trajectory held relatively flat through late May and into early June before dipping noticeably in the week of June 8, suggesting a brief period where negative discussion intensified or positive framing fell off. Scores then recovered into the low 30s through late June, implying some stabilization, though the overall register remained low. A single outlying high score appeared in the final data point but was attached to only one mention, making it difficult to read as a meaningful directional shift. The general arc was one of modest, fragile recovery from a mid-window low.

Praise themes were sparse compared to complaints. A small number of mentions touched on integration quality and feature satisfaction, and at least one discussion framed Hasura positively as a foundational data layer for a project. These comments carried a constructive, optimistic tone but were clearly outnumbered.

Opinion appeared divided on security and privacy, with both themes appearing in complaint clusters rather than as unambiguous positives, suggesting some commenters viewed these areas as sources of concern even where others implied a degree of confidence. The mix of grassroots project scaffolding discussions alongside detailed bug filings also hinted at a split between early-stage adopters approaching the product with cautious enthusiasm and more experienced users running into sharp operational edges.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
735
Mentions in selected period
54
Weeks in range
7
vs Coding average (47)
Below by 17
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (53), Hacker News (1)

Compare with another tool

Hasura

30

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Hasura?

Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.

Explore the enterprise dashboard

Try Hasura

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Is Hasura your product?

See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.

Request early access

Compare with similar tools

Safari MCP Server logo

Safari MCP Server

84

A Model Context Protocol server that gives AI assistants programmatic access to Safari browser automation for developers.

Strong features
Limited data

Free

View Details
Astro logo

Astro

81

Astro is a web framework for building content-focused websites, aimed at developers who want fast, island-based architecture.

Easy to use
Limited data

Free

View Details