Back to Coding
HashiCorp logo

HashiCorp

HashiCorp provides infrastructure automation software tools for provisioning, securing, connecting, and running cloud infrastructure for teams.

Primary category: Coding
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 29, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

33
Pulse Score

+9 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 301 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 8 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Bugs and reliability problems dominated discussion of HashiCorp across the recent period, with complaints far outnumbering praise across 288 mentions. Commenters reported issues spanning multiple providers, including SSH provisioner slowdowns after an amazon-ebs update, Azure resource failures tied to 400 errors, and unexpected resource replacements in the Vault provider. Some discussion praised certain features and integrations, and several mentions highlighted a new AWS Lambda MicroVM-related release as a positive development.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Most-discussed praise

Strong features24
Good integrations21
Feature requests9
Security praise5
New releases4

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs185
Reliability120
Missing features66
Feature requests46
Lacking integrations9

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How HashiCorp compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 301 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub100% (301)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 301 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

amazon-ebs v1.8.1: SSH stdout relay ~50-70x slower than v1.8.0; verbose provisioners time out with "exit status: 123". #### Overview of the Issue After the amazon plugin auto-upgraded from **v1.8.0 → v1.8.1**, our amazon-ebs builds began failing with: The remote provisioner scrip...

GitHubJun 1, 2026

azurerm_app_service_environment_v3: Read fails with 400/51019 when platform returns "not supported ... with kind ASEV3" for inboundNetworkDependenciesEndpoints. ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [x] I have searched the existing issues Community Note * Please vote on this...

GitHubJun 15, 2026

Vault 2.0.0 Docker image fails to start: unable to set CAP_SETFCAP effective capability. **Describe the bug** After upgrading Docker image from 1.21.4 to 2.0.0, the container fails during startup with the following message: This happens because the container now runs as the vault...

GitHubApr 15, 2026

azurerm_static_web_app - every update fails with 400 "The PrivateLinkServiceConnectionState field is required" once a private endpoint is attached. ### Is there an existing issue for this? - [X] I have searched the existing issues Community Note * Please vote on this issue by add...

GitHubJun 4, 2026

[Bug]: version 5.10.0 changes to pki_secret_backend trigger resource replacement. ### Terraform Core Version 1.10.5 Terraform Vault Provider Version 5.10.0 Vault Server Version 1.16.2 Affected Resource(s) * vault_pki_secret_backend_root_cert * vault_pki_secret_backend_cert * vaul...

GitHubJun 23, 2026

1,459+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports and reliability complaints overwhelmingly dominated discussion, outnumbering praise mentions by a substantial margin.
  • Sentiment spiked briefly during a low-volume stretch in late May but fell back when discussion volume surged in early June and stayed subdued through late June.
  • Opinion was divided on provider-specific integrations, with some commenters describing pipeline-blocking regressions while others appeared less affected by the same issues.
  • Positive sentiment existed but remained a minority voice, concentrated around specific features and integrations rather than the product broadly.
Praise themeMentions
Strong features24
Good integrations21
Feature requests9
Security praise5
New releases4
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs185
Reliability120
Missing features66
Feature requests46
Lacking integrations9

Public discussion around HashiCorp over the four-week window was dominated by a heavy volume of bug reports and reliability complaints, which together dwarfed the praise signals by a wide margin. Commenters raised issues across multiple cloud provider integrations, with mentions pointing to regressions in specific plugin versions, unexpected resource replacement behavior, and state drift that went undetected during plan runs. The tone throughout was largely frustrated rather than hostile, suggesting users who rely on the tooling heavily and expect more stability than they perceived they were getting.

The score trajectory tells a telling story of a brief spike followed by a pull-back. Sentiment climbed noticeably around late May, reaching its highest point in the window, but volume at that moment was very low, so the lift likely reflected a small cluster of more favorable voices. When discussion volume surged sharply in early June, sentiment dropped back into the low-to-mid thirties and remained roughly flat through the final weeks. The pattern suggests the quieter periods leaned slightly positive while high-traffic weeks surfaced a proportionally larger share of complaints.

Praise did exist in the data. Feature-specific appreciation and integration highlights drew a modest but consistent thread of positive mentions, and a handful of commenters pointed to security-related strengths. New release activity generated some positive framing as well, though sample mentions suggested that at least one recent release introduced a regression that quickly became a complaint thread of its own.

Opinion divided most clearly around provider-specific behavior. Discussion suggested that some integrations, particularly on AWS and Azure resources, were seen as broken or brittle in ways that blocked pipelines and production workflows. Others in the same threads appeared to be working around issues without the same severity of impact, creating a split between users treating certain behaviors as critical blockers versus edge cases. Compatibility with adjacent tooling also surfaced as a point of tension, with some commenters noting gaps that others did not appear to encounter.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
1,464
Mentions in selected period
301
Weeks in range
8
vs Coding average (46)
Below by 13
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (301)

Compare with another tool

HashiCorp

33

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you HashiCorp?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try HashiCorp

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

Bubble logo

Bubble

75

No-code platform that lets users design, build, and deploy full-stack web applications without writing code.

Strong features
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details
RevenueCat logo

RevenueCat

75

A platform that manages in-app purchases, subscriptions, and revenue analytics for iOS and Android app developers.

Good integrations
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details