Deno
Deno is a JavaScript and TypeScript runtime for developers building server-side and web applications.
About this data
Updated June 29, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+18 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 78 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 11 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Sentiment around Deno over the recent period skewed notably negative, with bugs and reliability concerns dominating discussion and accounting for the majority of mentions. Commenters raised issues including compilation failures on Snap installs, broken redirects on Deno Deploy, and unit test failures in CI environments. A handful of positive exchanges touched on security praise and integration wins, with some discussion focused on feature requests like PQC support and broader Vite detection. Overall tone reflected frustration outweighing enthusiasm.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Deno compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 78 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 78 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“App compilation fails on snap install due to read-only Deno temp location. ### Description: Rocket.Chat Apps cannot be enabled on the official Snap deployment of Rocket.Chat 8.5.1. This is reproducible with the Marketplace app GIPHY. When enabling the GIPHY app, Rocket.Chat repor...”
“For a website, which I once migrated from WordPress to Deno Deploy, I have a simple redirect in place for any files below /wp-content/. After I discovered that this redirect does not work anymore, I spent several hours searching for a bug in my own code or configuration. The culp...”
“Please document language formatting capabilities. Today I noticed, that deno fmt was automatically formatting my XML files. (and beautifully at that!) By default - mind you - not hidden behind a feature/unstable flag. However, this is not mentioned in deno fmt --help or https://d...”
“Insecure run command on Fresh homepage . The fresh homepage, and possibly the docs too, show a short and easy-to-run command to set up Fresh: deno run -Ar jsr:@fresh/init. This command uses -A (--allow-all) and -r(--reload), making it download code from the internet and executing...”
“broken link to Deno.Tray on tray_and_dock.md. ~~From runtime/desktop/tray_and_dock.md :~~ ~~> const tray = new Deno.Tray();~~ ~~but with deno 2.9.0 :~~ edit: sorry, I run without "desktop", I rename the issue for the broken link only : on runtime/desktop/tray_and_dock.md (or docs...”
594+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Bug reports and reliability complaints dominated discussion by a substantial margin over the four-week window.
- Sentiment followed an unstable trajectory, with brief recoveries repeatedly undercut by fresh technical frustrations, and the tone reaching its lowest point in early June before a partial late rebound.
- Security perception was divided, with some commenters praising the model while others pointed to permissive defaults and unverified module behavior as concerns.
- Feature requests appeared on both the positive and negative sides of discussion, reflecting engaged but impatient sentiment about the platform's pace of development.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Strong features | 11 |
| Feature requests | 8 |
| New releases | 6 |
| Good integrations | 4 |
| Easy to use | 4 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 33 |
| Reliability | 22 |
| Missing features | 7 |
| Feature requests | 6 |
| UI frustrations | 5 |
Public discussion around Deno over the four-week window was heavily weighted toward frustration, with bug reports and reliability concerns dominating the conversation by a wide margin. Commenters raised issues spanning snap installation failures, broken redirects on Deno Deploy, CI test breakages, and integrity verification gaps in module handling. The sheer volume of complaint-side mentions around bugs and reliability suggests that for many participants in the discussion, day-to-day friction with the runtime was a persistent and unresolved theme rather than an isolated incident.
Sentiment moved in a notably unsteady pattern across the window. Discussion opened at a relatively more positive point in early May, then declined through mid-to-late May before briefly recovering around the third week. A sharper drop followed in early June, bringing tone to its lowest point in the observed window, and the most recent data point shows a partial rebound. The trajectory communicates less a steady decline and more a cycle of brief recoveries undercut by recurring technical grievances.
Praise did exist in the discussion, though it was clearly outweighed. Several mentions highlighted specific features positively, and a handful of commenters flagged security as a strength, which sits in tension with other mentions pointing to security-adjacent concerns such as the use of permissive run flags on official documentation pages and unverified binary downloads. This split suggests that security perception was genuinely divided, with some commenters praising the model and others surfacing what they viewed as gaps in practice.
Opinion was also divided around the ecosystem's direction. Feature requests appeared on both the praise and complaint sides of the data, indicating that commenters were engaged enough to want more from the runtime but uncertain it was moving fast enough. Discussion around missing framework detection and absent documentation sections like WASI coverage pointed to a sense that the platform's ambitions outpaced its current completeness.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+18 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 78 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 11 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Deno
41
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Deno?
If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.
Share feedbackAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Compare with similar tools
Bubble
No-code platform that lets users design, build, and deploy full-stack web applications without writing code.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsRevenueCat
A platform that manages in-app purchases, subscriptions, and revenue analytics for iOS and Android app developers.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details