Back to Coding
Confluent logo

Confluent

Confluent is a data streaming platform built on Apache Kafka that helps developers and enterprises manage real-time data pipelines.

Primary category: Coding
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated May 18, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

41
Pulse Score

+1 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 147 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 6 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Over the recent four-week period, community discussion around Confluent was heavily weighted toward frustration, with bugs and integration problems accounting for the majority of mentions. Commenters flagged specific regressions including a ClusterAuthorizationException breaking AdminClient behavior, SASL/SCRAM authentication failures with Apache Kafka 4.0, and leaked test dependencies in Go modules. A smaller number of voices offered praise, with several mentions highlighting schema registry and Avro integration positively, and at least one commenter expressing anticipation for the shared groups feature from KIP-932.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.

Most-discussed praise

Strong features8
Good integrations7
Reliability3
Compared to rivals2
Polished UI1

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs61
Lacking integrations33
Reliability27
Missing features23
Feature requests6

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Confluent compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 147 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub100% (147)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 147 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

[BUG] v1.5.0 regression: ClusterAuthorizationException from describeLogDirs invalidates AdminClient, breaking Confluent Cloud clusters. ### Issue submitter TODO list - [x] I've looked up my issue in FAQ - [x] I've searched for an already existing issues here - [x] I've tried runn...

GitHubApr 22, 2026

Integration tests are leaking test dependancies into downstream Go modules. Eg https://github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-go/blob/b88a91bc1466e0a68b280fd3edc80e94510c826a/kafka/integration_test.go#L33 adds the github.com/docker/docker and github.com/testcontainers/testcontai...

GitHubMay 11, 2026

SASL/SCRAM authentication fails with Apache Kafka 4.0 brokers due to outdated Confluent.Kafka / librdkafka dependency. ### TL;DR The extension pins Confluent.Kafka 2.4.0 (bundling librdkafka 2.4.0), which has a SASL/SCRAM nonce bug (librdkafka#4895). Apache Kafka 4.0 tightened se...

GitHubApr 27, 2026

Value window for Consumer only two lines height since update to "Confluent" 253.25910.0. Just got the new update to "Confluent" (Plugin Renaming) version 253.25910.0 on windows 11. Now, the window to displaying the messages value of a consumer is hillariously small and cannot be ...

GitHubApr 8, 2026

Docker image for the confluent-cloud-cost-exporter is missing.. Hi team, Following the tutorial from https://github.com/confluentinc/jmx-monitoring-stacks/blob/8a6169880a6c687f30adeefe003811a006b7c860/ccloud-prometheus-grafana/README.md. It looks like the confluent-cloud-cost-exp...

GitHubApr 15, 2026

1,937+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports and integration complaints dominated discussion volume by a wide margin over the four-week window.
  • Sentiment dipped to its lowest point in early April then partially recovered before falling again in the most recent week, suggesting no stable improvement in tone.
  • Opinion was divided between commenters excited about upcoming features and those frustrated by authentication failures and dependency issues blocking current use.
  • The gap between enthusiasm for future capabilities and frustration with present reliability was a persistent theme across multiple weeks of discussion.
Praise themeMentions
Strong features8
Good integrations7
Reliability3
Compared to rivals2
Polished UI1
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs61
Lacking integrations33
Reliability27
Missing features23
Feature requests6

Public discussion of Confluent over the four-week window analyzed was heavily skewed toward frustration, with complaint themes outnumbering praise themes by a wide margin in raw mention volume. Bug reports dominated the conversation, accounting for the single largest theme across all mentions, and commenters frequently flagged specific regressions and authentication failures tied to version updates and dependency pinning. Integration shortcomings formed the second major complaint cluster, with several mentions pointing to issues spanning multiple environments and downstream module contamination. Reliability and missing features rounded out a complaint picture that left little room for positive framing.

Sentiment direction over the recent weeks traced a rough valley-and-recovery arc before sliding again. Scores drifted downward from late March into early April, reaching their lowest recorded point in the window during the week of April 6. Discussion then stabilized and climbed through late April into early May, where the highest score in the window appeared, coinciding with a notable surge in mention volume. That recovery proved short-lived, as the most recent week showed a meaningful drop back toward the lower end of the range, suggesting the rebound was fragile rather than a durable shift in tone.

Where opinion divided most clearly was around integration and authentication behavior. Some commenters expressed genuine enthusiasm for upcoming features, with several mentions highlighting anticipation for newer Kafka capabilities and schema evolution support as positive signals. Others in the same technical territory voiced sharp frustration that existing authentication mechanisms were broken or hardcoded in ways that blocked real-world deployments. The gap between what commenters hoped the product would become and what they reported experiencing day-to-day was a recurring undercurrent across the discussion.

Overall the tone remained cautious to negative throughout the window, with pockets of technical optimism failing to offset a complaint volume that commenters kept returning to across multiple weeks.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
1,942
Mentions in selected period
147
Weeks in range
6
vs Coding average (47)
Below by 6
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (147)

Compare with another tool

Confluent

41

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Confluent?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try Confluent

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

Bubble logo

Bubble

75

No-code platform that lets users design, build, and deploy full-stack web applications without writing code.

Strong features
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details
RevenueCat logo

RevenueCat

75

A platform that manages in-app purchases, subscriptions, and revenue analytics for iOS and Android app developers.

Good integrations
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details