Checkly
Checkly is a monitoring platform for developers to run API and end-to-end browser checks on web applications.
About this data
Updated June 1, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+7 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 14 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 7 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Sentiment around Checkly dipped slightly over the recent period, with bug reports drawing the most attention among a modest volume of mentions. Commenters flagged several CLI issues, including problems with Bun workspace discovery, pnpm dlx compatibility, and a deprecated glob dependency. On the positive side, discussion focused on integration possibilities, with several mentions praising synthetic monitoring setups and API integration potential. Feature requests for expanded webhook support and environment-specific configuration also surfaced, suggesting engaged but occasionally frustrated users.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Checkly compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 14 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 14 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“bug: Bun workspace root object (workspaces: { packages, catalogs }) breaks workspace discovery with patterns.map is not a function. ### Node.js version 22.17.1 NPM version 11.9.0 @checkly/cli version 7.11.0 Steps to reproduce **Description**: Checkly CLI fails during deploy / deb...”
“bug: Cannot use pnpm dlx due to requirement on jiti. ### Node.js version v24.15.0 NPM version pnpm 11.0.9 @checkly/cli version 7.15.0 Steps to reproduce Run pnpm dlx checkly test --deploy What is expected? In older versions, it worked fine. What is actually happening? Error: Unab...”
“Update CLI glob dependency from deprecated glob@10.5.0. ### Node.js version v25.8.1 NPM version 11.11.0 @checkly/cli version checkly@7.15.0 Steps to reproduce Install checkly@7.15.0 in an npm project: What is expected? The install should not pull in deprecated glob@10.5.0 copies ...”
“feat: add WEBHOOK_ROOTLY support to webhook alert channel type. ## Feature Request Summary Add WEBHOOK_ROOTLY as a supported value for the webhook_type field on the checkly_alert_channel webhook block. Motivation Rootly is an incident management platform with a native Checkly int...”
“Request: Transfer provider-checkly to crossplane-contrib. Requesting transfer of https://github.com/sanmoh-hombal/provider-checkly to crossplane-contrib/provider-checkly. Name of new provider provider-checkly Purpose and intended scope provider-checkly is a Crossplane provider fo...”
117+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- CLI bugs dominated complaint sentiment, with multiple commenters citing specific regressions across package manager and runtime combinations.
- Sentiment declined from the prior period and followed a volatile trajectory, peaking in mid-May before dropping sharply in the most recent window.
- Positive discussion centered on integration potential, with commenters expressing enthusiasm for connecting Checkly to broader alert and observability workflows.
- Opinion was divided between users encountering blocking tooling issues and others engaging with the product in an expansive, feature-building mindset.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Strong features | 4 |
| Good integrations | 4 |
| Reliability | 3 |
| Feature requests | 2 |
| Easy to use | 1 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 7 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Lacking integrations | 2 |
| Missing features | 2 |
| Security praise | 1 |
Public discussion around Checkly over the observed four-week window was relatively sparse in volume, making each mention carry outsized weight in shaping the tone. The dominant thread running through commenters was frustration with CLI-level bugs, with several mentions describing concrete breakage tied to specific package manager and runtime combinations. References to a Bun workspace compatibility failure and a pnpm dlx regression suggested to some discussers that tooling reliability had slipped across recent CLI versions, and one mention pointed to a deprecated dependency being pulled into fresh installs as an additional source of irritation.
On the more positive side, the integration theme attracted meaningful attention. Several mentions framed Checkly as a natural fit within broader observability and incident management workflows, with references to connecting it to alert channels and community data sources suggesting commenters viewed its extensibility as a genuine strength. Feature praise and feature requests appeared in roughly equal measure, hinting at a user base that remains engaged and constructive even when lodging complaints.
The score trajectory over the window told a notably uneven story. Discussion opened at a low point in early April and dipped further before recovering through late April and into May, reaching a local high in mid-May. That recovery did not hold, and the final data point reflected a sharp pullback, leaving sentiment below the midpoint. The overall direction from the prior period to the current period was a modest decline, and the volatility week to week suggested that individual mentions, given the low total volume, were swinging tone considerably.
Opinion appeared most divided around the CLI experience specifically. Some commenters engaged with Checkly in an entirely aspirational register, scoping out monitoring suites and integration expansions, while others were stuck on regressions that blocked basic usage. That gap between enthusiastic adoption framing and reported breakage friction was the clearest fault line in the discussion.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+7 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 14 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 7 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Checkly
48
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Checkly?
If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.
Share feedbackAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Compare with similar tools
Bubble
No-code platform that lets users design, build, and deploy full-stack web applications without writing code.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsRevenueCat
A platform that manages in-app purchases, subscriptions, and revenue analytics for iOS and Android app developers.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details