Back to Coding
Appwrite logo

Appwrite

Appwrite is an open-source backend platform providing APIs for authentication, databases, storage, and functions to developers building web and mobile apps.

Primary category: Coding
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated December 29, 2025

Overall Pulse Score

28
Pulse Score

A 0-100 index measuring online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality. No public mentions were recorded in the selected period; this score reflects the most recent data, from December 29, 2025.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

No public discussion recorded in this period. The score reflects the most recent data, from December 29, 2025. Try a wider range to see the trend.

This week in public discussion

Discussion around Appwrite in the recent period was dominated by bug reports and reliability concerns, which accounted for the large majority of mentions across the 4-week window. Commenters frequently flagged issues including realtime event failures, deployment errors with S3 storage, CLI login failures, and 500 errors when adding custom domains. Several feature requests also drew attention, particularly around Dart runtime version support. A small number of mentions offered praise for performance and integrations, but the overall tone was notably critical.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

No public discussion recorded in this period. The score reflects the most recent data, from December 29, 2025. Try a wider range to see the breakdown.

How Appwrite compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Coding.

No public discussion recorded in this period to compare. Scores reflect the most recent data, from December 29, 2025. Try a wider range to see the comparison.

Sample public mentions

A small sample of publicly posted comments, shown for context with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

Not enough relevant public mentions yet to show a sample.

Deeper analysis

  • Bug reports and reliability complaints dominated the conversation by a wide margin, setting a persistently negative overall tone.
  • Sentiment declined steadily through mid-to-late November before a partial recovery in December, though that recovery coincided with much lower mention volume.
  • Opinion was most divided between self-hosted and cloud users, with self-hosted commenters expressing sharper frustration around deployment and runtime inconsistencies.
  • A small but present positive current around performance and integrations existed, yet it was not enough to meaningfully counter the weight of critical discussion.

Public discussion of Appwrite over the past four weeks was dominated heavily by frustration, with bug reports and reliability concerns accounting for the overwhelming majority of complaint-coded mentions. Commenters surfaced issues spanning CLI login failures, function deployment breakdowns in self-hosted environments, realtime event gaps with atomic operations, and server errors on cloud infrastructure. The sheer volume of bug-themed mentions relative to praise-themed ones gave the overall conversation a tone of accumulated grievance rather than isolated incident, and several mentions framed their reports with a sense of urgency around core functionality.

Sentiment direction traced a clear and mostly downward arc through the middle weeks of the window. Discussion opened at a relatively higher point in early November, then slid steadily through mid-November and into late November before reaching its lowest point in the trajectory. A brief but notable recovery appeared in the first days of December, followed by another dip the following week. The final two data points, covering mid-to-late December, showed the highest scores in the entire window, though mention volume by that period had fallen considerably, suggesting the more positive tone may partly reflect a quieter, self-selecting slice of commentary rather than a broad shift in crowd sentiment.

Where opinion was divided, the split tended to fall along lines of deployment context and use case. Self-hosted users voiced some of the sharpest reliability frustrations, particularly around third-party storage integrations and runtime version mismatches. A recurring sub-thread around Dart runtime support drew multiple commenters pointing out inconsistencies between what different parts of the platform support, a complaint framed as a workflow blocker rather than a minor inconvenience. A smaller set of commenters touched on positive notes around performance and integration quality, but these voices were sparse and did not appear to shift the broader tone.

Usability friction surfaced in a quieter but persistent way. Several mentions reflected confusion navigating the interface to locate basic identifiers, suggesting that for some commenters the product's learning curve added to rather than softened their frustration with underlying bugs. Enhancement requests around developer workflow, including runtime upgrades and safer local onboarding practices, pointed to a community that remains engaged but is pressing for maturity in tooling and consistency across environments.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
1,804
Mentions in selected period
0
Weeks in range
0
vs Coding average (48)
Below by 20
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
Collecting

Compare with another tool

Appwrite

28

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Appwrite?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try Appwrite

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

RevenueCat logo

RevenueCat

75

A platform that manages in-app purchases, subscriptions, and revenue analytics for iOS and Android app developers.

Good integrations
Limited data

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details
Codemirror logo

Codemirror

74

An open-source JavaScript code editor component for browsers, used by developers building web-based text and code editing interfaces.

Strong features
Limited data

Free

View Details