Todoist

A task management and to-do list application serving individuals and teams who need to organize, prioritize, and track their work.

Primary category: business

Visit Todoist

About this data

This page reflects aggregated public online discussion, not statements of fact or our own opinion. Scores summarize the tone of relevant public mentions and carry the limitations described in our methodology. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 15, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

Pulse Score

-17 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 141 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 12 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

This week in public discussion

Sentiment around Todoist held steady over the recent period, with praise centered on ease of use and recurring task handling, and several commenters describing it as genuinely useful for staying organized. Complaints were roughly equal in volume, with bugs, reliability concerns, and missing features drawing notable criticism. A few mentions reflected users drifting toward alternatives due to workplace restrictions or a feeling that the app added pressure rather than reducing it.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

PositiveMixedNeutralNegative

Most-discussed praise

Strong features19

Easy to use14

Good integrations11

Feature requests4

AI quality2

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs33

Reliability25

Missing features21

Lacking integrations9

UI frustrations8

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 141 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

“Annyi minden volt a fejemben, hogy mit kellene csinálnom, hogy gondoltam írok belőle egy listát. Mióta megnyitottam a Todoist appot, egy se jut eszembe. 😂🤡”

blueskyJun 15, 2026

“Habe viele Jahre mit todoist gearbeitet aber mein Arbeitgeber gibt es für Outlook nicht mehr frei. Bin jetzt wieder bei Excel (laufende Aufgabentabelle) und Outlookkalender gekoppelt. Und Papier.”

blueskyJun 10, 2026

“I decided to move my personal todo list stuff from low-level notes over to todoist today. So I put "move todo list to todoist" on my todo list. And putting that todo list onto todoist meant putting "move todo list to todoist" in todoist.”

bluesky2 days ago

“Ohne ToDoIst in der Pro-Version wäre ich verloren. Man kann sich die App aber auch zu voll packen und sollte dann sinnvoll filtern (Eisenhower-Methode oder ähnliches). Find es speziell für wiederkehrende Aufgaben super.”

blueskyJun 10, 2026

“I use an app called Todoist to basically organise my life 🤣 have a GO projects section on it with the deadlines on all the projects 🤣”

blueskyJun 9, 2026

259+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

Ease of use was the top praise theme but bugs, reliability, and missing features dominated the complaint side by a wider combined margin.
Sentiment oscillated across the tracked weeks with no sustained improvement, finishing flat compared to the prior period.
Opinion was split between users who expressed strong personal reliance on the product and those actively considering or already using alternatives.
Discussion tone was personal and emotionally engaged, suggesting commenters had a high-investment relationship with the product regardless of whether they were praising or criticizing it.

Praise theme	Mentions
Strong features	19
Easy to use	14
Good integrations	11
Feature requests	4
AI quality	2

Complaint theme	Mentions
Bugs	33
Reliability	25
Missing features	21
Lacking integrations	9
UI frustrations	8

Discussion around Todoist over the four-week window landed in notably divided territory, with praise and complaints running almost neck and neck in raw volume. Ease of use drew the most positive remarks, with commenters describing the app as a practical anchor for daily life organization, and several mentions framed it in personal, even self-deprecating terms, suggesting an emotional familiarity with the product rather than purely functional appreciation. Feature praise and a handful of positive integration comments rounded out the goodwill, though the praise side of the ledger carried noticeably fewer mentions than the complaint side.

On the negative end, bugs, reliability concerns, and missing features each accumulated substantial mention counts, and together they formed a persistent undercurrent of frustration. UI complaints and integration gaps added further weight to the critical side. Discussion suggested that some users felt the product had real potential that was being held back by execution issues rather than concept problems. One thread of commentary implied that competitors or self-hosted alternatives were starting to appear on the radar for users who found the core experience inconsistent.

The score trajectory over the tracked weeks showed a pattern of oscillation rather than any clean directional trend. Sentiment opened around a modest level in late April, dipped into the low forties by mid-May, briefly recovered, then slid back before recovering again in the most recent weeks. The overall four-week score remained flat against the previous period, which discussion context suggests reflects a kind of stalemate between loyal everyday users and those encountering repeated friction.

Opinion was most visibly divided around whether the product serves as a reliable backbone for personal productivity or whether its shortcomings push users toward workarounds and alternatives. Some commenters expressed genuine affection and dependence, while others described migrating to spreadsheets, paper, or competing tools.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.