Back to Business
Todoist logo

Todoist

A task management and to-do list application serving individuals and teams who need to organize, prioritize, and track their work.

Primary category: Business
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated July 6, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

51
Pulse Score

+3 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 199 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 24 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

Download chart

This week in public discussion

Community discussion around Todoist over the recent period was mildly mixed, with a pulse score holding steady near 51. Commenters frequently praised the app for ease of use, with several mentions highlighting how naturally it fits into daily routines for managing recurring tasks and offloading mental workload. On the complaint side, discussion focused on missing features and integration gaps, with one commenter specifically calling out the lost Alexa integration as a frustrating regression. A handful of mentions also touched on reliability and occasional bugs.

Read the deeper analysis

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.

Most-discussed praise

Strong features35
Easy to use25
Good integrations18
Feature requests6
Mobile app5

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs34
Missing features31
Reliability27
Lacking integrations10
Compared to rivals9

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

How Todoist compares

Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in Business.

Where the mentions come from

Share of the 199 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.

GitHub64% (128)
Hacker News23% (45)
Bluesky13% (26)

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 199 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

Annyi minden volt a fejemben, hogy mit kellene csinálnom, hogy gondoltam írok belőle egy listát. Mióta megnyitottam a Todoist appot, egy se jut eszembe. 😂🤡

BlueskyJun 15, 2026

Habe viele Jahre mit todoist gearbeitet aber mein Arbeitgeber gibt es für Outlook nicht mehr frei. Bin jetzt wieder bei Excel (laufende Aufgabentabelle) und Outlookkalender gekoppelt. Und Papier.

BlueskyJun 10, 2026

I decided to move my personal todo list stuff from low-level notes over to todoist today. So I put "move todo list to todoist" on my todo list. And putting that todo list onto todoist meant putting "move todo list to todoist" in todoist.

BlueskyJun 22, 2026

5 months building. Today I’m opening the first 100 founding seats. Mini Me OS picks one task for your ADHD brain instead of giving you 47. Built it because Todoist, Notion and 6 other planners all made me feel like I failed every time life got messy. Free 14-day trial, no card mi...

BlueskyMay 28, 2026

OAuth invalid_client error when connecting ChatGPT MCP to Todoist. ## Description I’m attempting to connect the Todoist MCP server to ChatGPT via the official connector flow, but the OAuth step consistently fails with an invalid_client error. Steps to reproduce In ChatGPT, enable...

GitHubMay 14, 2026

283+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Ease of use dominated praise but was frequently shadowed by complaints about missing features and broken integrations.
  • Sentiment dropped sharply in late May during the highest-volume discussion period before partially recovering through late June.
  • Opinion was most divided on integrations, with some commenters describing smooth workflows and others citing specific connections that had disappeared or broken.
  • Even critical commenters often expressed continued reliance on the app, giving the overall tone a resigned-but-attached quality rather than outright rejection.
Praise themeMentions
Strong features35
Easy to use25
Good integrations18
Feature requests6
Mobile app5
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs34
Missing features31
Reliability27
Lacking integrations10
Compared to rivals9

Discussion about Todoist over the recent four-week window was moderate in volume and closely split between positive and negative tones, with ease of use emerging as the single strongest source of goodwill. Commenters most frequently praised the app for lowering mental overhead and building reliable daily habits around task management, with several mentions describing it as a dependable external memory system. Feature praise also appeared regularly, though it was often paired with feature requests, suggesting that positive impressions frequently arrived with a wish list attached.

The sentiment trajectory told a clear two-phase story. Discussion opened near a middling baseline, then dropped noticeably across the two weeks ending May 25 and June 1, a period that also saw the heaviest mention volume. The tone during that stretch leaned more critical, with complaints about missing features, integration gaps, and reliability surfacing more prominently. Several mentions in the sample pointed directly at integration friction, including a commenter who expressed frustration that a previously useful Alexa connection had been removed, and another who described wrestling with breaking changes to the API. This window appeared to concentrate the most friction-heavy conversation.

Sentiment then recovered gradually through mid-June and into late June before settling back at a roughly neutral level by the final week, which again carried relatively high mention volume. The recovery did not suggest a surge of enthusiasm so much as a return to the baseline ambivalence that characterized the window overall.

Opinion was most divided around integrations and reliability. Some commenters framed the app as a smooth part of a broader productivity stack, while others described specific connections as broken or absent. Bugs and a learning curve generated smaller but consistent complaint clusters, and the humorous or self-deprecating tone of several sample mentions suggested that even frustrated users retained a degree of affection for the product.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
288
Mentions in selected period
199
Weeks in range
24
vs Business average (51)
On average
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (128), Hacker News (45), Bluesky (26)

Compare with another tool

Todoist

51

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you Todoist?

Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.

Explore the enterprise dashboard

Try Todoist

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Is Todoist your product?

See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.

Request early access

Compare with similar tools

Trainual logo

Trainual

88

Trainual is a business documentation and training platform that helps companies build process manuals and onboard employees.

Strong features
Limited data

Paid plans available

View Details
LegalShield logo

LegalShield

76

LegalShield sells subscription-based legal service plans to individuals and employers in the US, UK, and Canada.

Strong features
Limited data

Paid plans available

View Details