Grammarly
Grammarly is an AI writing assistant that checks grammar, clarity, and tone for individuals and teams writing in English.
About this data
Updated July 13, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
-12 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 336 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 25 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Sentiment around Grammarly in the recent period skewed notably negative, with complaints about AI quality, missing features, and bugs driving the bulk of discussion. A significant share of mentions centered on critical reactions to public statements made by a Grammarly education representative, with commenters expressing strong frustration over the company's messaging around AI and writing in academic settings. Some praise surfaced around specific features and ease of use, and a few excerpts noted that students in classroom discussions still viewed Grammarly favorably compared to other AI tools.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Grammarly compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in AI Writing.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 336 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 336 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“Grammarly now suggests I delete an em dash everytime I use one, presumably to avoid being flagged as AI writing. Fuck you bot, you can pry my em dashes from my cold, dead hands”
“Someone just got snotty with me about a typo… MFKA I write every word next to my name. I have never used an LLM. I legit just got rid of Grammarly premium because I don’t like the new version & I only wanted it for grammar checks. MY TYPOS REFLECT MY HUMANITY!”
“Maybe this isn’t about Grammarly, but it explains why I’ve cancelled my subscription. All I wanted was a proofreading tool that pointed out misspelled words and missing or incorrect punctuation.”
“Just what I was looking for.. I am good at spelling and I am always looking for ways to improve my vocabulary and to improve my messages. This app assists me in meeting my goals.”
“Depend on it daily!. Yes, I love it and use it daily. I write the way I talk, which is never grammatically correct, unfortunately. I depend on Grammarly to make better sense of my thoughts. I wish more people would do the same, so I could better understand their writings better!”
838+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- The dominant theme was backlash against Grammarly's public stance on AI in education, which generated some of the most emotionally intense discussion in the window.
- Sentiment followed a sharp decline from a mid-May peak before partially stabilizing at a lower level, with the overall direction of the period clearly negative.
- Opinion was divided between users who valued the tool for practical editing tasks and a vocal segment of educators and writers who objected to the company's broader AI ambitions.
- AI quality was simultaneously the top complaint and a meaningful praise theme, reflecting a genuinely split view of whether the AI functionality helps or undermines the writing process.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Strong features | 79 |
| Easy to use | 75 |
| AI quality | 21 |
| Compared to rivals | 8 |
| Mobile app | 7 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| AI quality | 56 |
| Bugs | 38 |
| UI frustrations | 35 |
| Missing features | 33 |
| Compared to rivals | 25 |
Public discussion around Grammarly over the past four weeks has been dominated by a sharp and emotionally charged debate about the company's positioning in education, with AI quality complaints forming the single largest complaint theme by a wide margin. Commenters reacted with visible anger to statements attributed to a Grammarly education executive urging educators to accept AI-assisted writing as the future norm, with several mentions framing this as a conflict of interest given that the company reportedly also develops cheating detection tools. The rhetorical temperature in these conversations ran high, with some commenters drawing unflattering analogies to predatory industries.
The score trajectory tells a clear story of deterioration after an early period of relative warmth. Discussion opened the window at moderate-to-positive levels in mid-to-late May, briefly peaking around May 25th before beginning a steep decline that bottomed out sharply in early June. Sentiment partially recovered in the June 15th period but then resumed a gradual downward drift through late June and into early July, suggesting the controversy around the education messaging had lasting effects on tone even as the initial spike of outrage faded.
On the praise side, commenters acknowledged specific features and ease of use in reasonable numbers, and one notable mention described students in a classroom discussion arriving at a broadly anti-AI consensus while still carving out Grammarly as an acceptable exception. This nuance points to a divided audience: casual users who find practical value in the tool versus educators, writers, and critics who see the company's broader ambitions as philosophically objectionable.
The competitor comparison theme appeared on both the praise and complaint sides, indicating that some commenters used rival tools as a reference point to criticize Grammarly while others found it favorable by comparison. Bugs and UI complaints added a more routine undercurrent of frustration that ran alongside the larger ideological debate, suggesting the product itself faces credibility pressure on multiple fronts simultaneously.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
-12 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 336 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 25 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Grammarly
39
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Grammarly?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is Grammarly your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Koala AI
Koala AI is an AI-powered writing tool that helps content creators and marketers generate blog posts and SEO-optimized articles.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsCopy.ai
AI-powered writing tool that generates marketing copy, blog posts, and other content for individuals and teams.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details