Veo
A video generation model developed by Google that creates short video clips from text and image prompts.
About this data
Updated August 3, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+10 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 186 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 25 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Discussion around Veo over the recent period leaned cautiously positive, with commenters most often praising its features and AI quality, including several mentions of the Performance Control approach and historical video reconstruction work as impressive demonstrations. New feature availability also drew attention, with users noting free credit options across multiple platforms. A handful of complaints surfaced around bugs and reliability, including reports of an API integration issue affecting video generation. Competitor comparisons appeared occasionally, keeping sentiment measured rather than enthusiastic.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Ringed points mark weeks with unusually high discussion volume, more than double this product's typical week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Veo compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in AI Video.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 186 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 186 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
β[Bug]: video_generate: Google Veo 3.1 returns 404 'No such model' due to wrong API endpoint. ## Problem The video_generate tool fails when using google/veo-3.1-fast-generate-preview model with error: Environment - OpenClaw version: 2026.4.8 (also affected 2026.4.5 when feature wa...β
βRe: "LAST CHANCE! π¨ GROK Is Down β Use VEO 3.1 FREE For 4 Months Before Itβs Gone". Thanku soooooooo soooooooo soooooooo much,sab sy alug sab sy munfrid Vedio hyβ
βFor the past few months I've created lots of videos using AI. Most of them are 3d animal short stories. Got 650k followers in Tiktok. An interesting finding: For image generation, gemini's nano banana is the king. All other models are just good to be the followers... For video ge...β
βHi HN,I built NanoMaker AI as a personal project because I wanted to work only with the top AI models, but couldn't find a platform that combined them.For my creative workflow, I use:Nano Banana for generating imagesSora2 Veo 3.1 for turning images into videosSuno for generating ...β
βRe: "ALERT! Grok, Veo 3.1 & Seedance 2.0 FREE (No Watermark + 3 Secret Method) π±". Me india se video dekhta hu bahut acha lagta hai ye dekh kr aur achi aap bata ti bhi hai ek dikat hai ki jo 8 se 10 country ka option deti hai language chenj kr ne ke liye us me india ka bhi langu...β
375+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Feature praise and AI quality drove the most discussion, but AI quality also attracted criticism, making it the most contested theme.
- Sentiment dropped sharply in mid-June during the highest-traffic period, then rebounded and gradually stabilized in a moderately positive range through late July.
- Opinion was most divided around specific generative outputs, with some commenters expressing enthusiasm for creative applications and others raising pointed concerns.
- Developer-facing frustration appeared in a small number of mentions, suggesting integration reliability is a distinct undercurrent beneath the broader positive tone.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Strong features | 45 |
| New releases | 37 |
| AI quality | 31 |
| Compared to rivals | 14 |
| Good integrations | 13 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 31 |
| Reliability | 14 |
| Missing features | 11 |
| AI quality | 10 |
| Compared to rivals | 6 |
Discussion of Veo over the four-week window was modest in volume but fairly consistent in its focus on capability and positioning. Feature praise dominated, with commenters repeatedly highlighting the tool's output quality and noting new releases, and ai_quality appearing prominently on both the praise and complaint sides, suggesting the topic generated genuinely split opinion rather than settled consensus. Competitor comparison threads appeared in several mentions, with Veo named alongside other AI video tools in roundup-style discussions, indicating the product is being actively benchmarked rather than evaluated in isolation.
The score trajectory tells a notably volatile story in the earlier weeks. Sentiment opened in the mid-fifties in early June before dipping further the following week, a period that also carried the highest mention volume of the window, suggesting a surge of more critical or mixed commentary drove the dip. A sharp rebound followed, though that recovery week had very low mention counts, making it difficult to read as a broad consensus shift. From late June onward the scores settled into a narrower band in the mid-to-upper sixties and low seventies, with a modest uptick in the final tracked week, pointing to a cautious stabilization rather than a strong recovery.
Divided opinion was most visible around ai_quality, where commenters praised ambitious creative and technical applications, including references to physically precise video reconstruction projects, while others expressed discomfort or criticism about specific generative outputs and their implications. Bug and reliability themes surfaced in a handful of mentions, with at least one technically detailed report describing an API-level integration problem, suggesting developer-facing frustration runs alongside broader enthusiasm.
The overall tone felt exploratory. Discussion suggested a community still actively mapping what the tool can and cannot do, weighing it against alternatives, and processing both its creative potential and its rougher edges. Sentiment appears to have leveled off in a moderately positive range after an earlier period of more turbulent reaction.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+10 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 186 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 25 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Veo
67
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Veo?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is Veo your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Runway
AI-powered video generation and editing platform serving filmmakers, designers, and content creators.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsLuma AI
Luma AI is a video generation tool that produces high-quality AI-generated video clips for creators and studios.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details