xAI
xAI is an artificial intelligence company offering the Grok conversational AI assistant to general consumers and developers.
About this data
Updated June 22, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+5 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 227 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 10 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Sentiment around xAI in the recent period skewed notably negative, with commenters raising a high volume of bug reports and reliability concerns across integrations. Discussion focused heavily on issues such as missing models, timeout mismatches, and API response handling errors. Several mentions offered praise for new features and integration possibilities, and some commenters submitted feature requests around expanded access and configuration options, but these were far outnumbered by complaints about instability and incomplete functionality.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 227 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“[Bug] Composer 2.5 model not available in xAI/Grok connection. ### Description Description When connecting to xAI/Grok in OpenCode, the **Composer 2.5** model does not appear in the model list after running /models. Steps to Reproduce 1. Run opencode to start the application 2. E...”
“Feature request: native xAI Grok Voice Agent API support in voice-call realtime. # Feature request: native xAI Grok Voice Agent API support in voice-call realtime Summary xAI shipped the **Grok Voice Agent API** in December 2025 (announcement: ). It is positioned as OpenAI-Realti...”
“[Bug] xAI/grok-4.3 usage tokens lost on tool-use turns since 2026.5.3 (5× cost under-reporting). ### Bug type Behavior bug (incorrect output/state without crash) Beta release blocker No Summary Starting in **2026.5.3**, xAI (xai/grok-4.3 and friends) tool-use turns no longer reco...”
“xAI OAuth succeeds for X Premium account, but grok-4.3 inference returns 403 subscription/resource error. ### Bug type Behavior bug (incorrect output/state without crash) Summary OpenClaw's xAI OAuth flow completes successfully and xai/grok-4.3 is listed as configured with auth, ...”
“Feature Request: XAI Platform. I can see Grok, but I only use XAI via the prepaid tokens. It would be great to track this, if possible Thanks.”
427+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Bugs and reliability concerns dominated discussion by a wide margin, setting a persistently cautious tone across the window.
- Sentiment peaked in late May then dropped sharply as mention volume spiked in early June, with only a modest recovery in the final week.
- Opinion on integration quality was split, with roughly equal signals of satisfaction and frustration depending on context.
- Active feature requests and positive competitor comparisons indicated genuine user engagement alongside the critical feedback.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Good integrations | 32 |
| Strong features | 28 |
| Feature requests | 24 |
| New releases | 23 |
| Compared to rivals | 13 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 101 |
| Reliability | 71 |
| Missing features | 26 |
| Lacking integrations | 26 |
| Poor support | 7 |
Public discussion around xAI over the four-week window was heavily shaped by frustration, with bugs and reliability concerns accounting for a disproportionate share of all recorded mentions. Commenters surfaced a recurring pattern of integration failures, missing model availability, and API inconsistencies, suggesting that the product is being tested across a widening range of third-party tooling but is struggling to meet the expectations that come with that expanded surface area. Several mentions pointed specifically to issues at the API layer, including timeout mismatches, payload handling errors, and streaming failures, which framed much of the negative tone as technically granular rather than broadly dismissive.
Sentiment trajectory over the window tells a more complicated story than the headline score implies. Discussion began at modest levels with very low mention volumes, then climbed to a notably warmer peak in late May before collapsing sharply in early June as mention volume surged. That surge, concentrated across the two busiest weeks of the window, appeared to pull scores down and stabilize them at a subdued level, suggesting that broader or more mainstream engagement brought a less forgiving audience with it. The slight uptick in the most recent week may hint at early stabilization, though commenters did not appear fully satisfied.
On the more positive side, a meaningful thread of praise emerged around integrations that were working well and specific feature releases, with several mentions framing new capabilities favorably and drawing competitor comparisons that were not uniformly negative toward xAI. Feature requests were also active, which discussion suggested reflects genuine user investment rather than pure dissatisfaction.
Opinion was notably divided on integration quality, with integration-good and integration-lacking appearing almost equally weighted in the data, indicating that experience varied sharply depending on use case or toolchain. The gap between enthusiastic early adopters and users encountering reliability walls appeared to be a central fault line in the overall sentiment picture.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+5 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 227 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 10 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
xAI
42
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you xAI?
If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.
Share feedbackAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Compare with similar tools
DeepSeek
Chinese AI lab offering open-weight large language models and a consumer chat interface for general-purpose use.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsClaude
Claude is a conversational AI assistant developed by Anthropic for individuals and businesses needing text-based AI support.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details