Back to AI Assistants
xAI logo

xAI

xAI is an artificial intelligence company offering the Grok conversational AI assistant to general consumers and developers.

Primary category: AI Assistants
About this data
This page reflects public online discussion, collected and scored by automated systems and summarized using AI. It is not a statement of fact, not an audit, and not our own opinion of the product. Automated analysis can be incomplete or wrong, and scores carry the limitations described in our methodology. Companies can respond with their own perspective. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 22, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

42
Pulse Score

+5 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 227 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 10 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

This week in public discussion

Sentiment around xAI in the recent period skewed notably negative, with commenters raising a high volume of bug reports and reliability concerns across integrations. Discussion focused heavily on issues such as missing models, timeout mismatches, and API response handling errors. Several mentions offered praise for new features and integration possibilities, and some commenters submitted feature requests around expanded access and configuration options, but these were far outnumbered by complaints about instability and incomplete functionality.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

PositiveMixedNeutralNegative

Most-discussed praise

Good integrations32
Strong features28
Feature requests24
New releases23
Compared to rivals13

Most-discussed complaints

Bugs101
Reliability71
Missing features26
Lacking integrations26
Poor support7

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 227 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

[Bug] Composer 2.5 model not available in xAI/Grok connection. ### Description Description When connecting to xAI/Grok in OpenCode, the **Composer 2.5** model does not appear in the model list after running /models. Steps to Reproduce 1. Run opencode to start the application 2. E...

githubJun 9, 2026

Feature request: native xAI Grok Voice Agent API support in voice-call realtime. # Feature request: native xAI Grok Voice Agent API support in voice-call realtime Summary xAI shipped the **Grok Voice Agent API** in December 2025 (announcement: ). It is positioned as OpenAI-Realti...

githubMay 9, 2026

[Bug] xAI/grok-4.3 usage tokens lost on tool-use turns since 2026.5.3 (5× cost under-reporting). ### Bug type Behavior bug (incorrect output/state without crash) Beta release blocker No Summary Starting in **2026.5.3**, xAI (xai/grok-4.3 and friends) tool-use turns no longer reco...

githubMay 5, 2026

xAI OAuth succeeds for X Premium account, but grok-4.3 inference returns 403 subscription/resource error. ### Bug type Behavior bug (incorrect output/state without crash) Summary OpenClaw's xAI OAuth flow completes successfully and xai/grok-4.3 is listed as configured with auth, ...

githubMay 20, 2026

Feature Request: XAI Platform. I can see Grok, but I only use XAI via the prepaid tokens. It would be great to track this, if possible Thanks.

github4 days ago

427+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • Bugs and reliability concerns dominated discussion by a wide margin, setting a persistently cautious tone across the window.
  • Sentiment peaked in late May then dropped sharply as mention volume spiked in early June, with only a modest recovery in the final week.
  • Opinion on integration quality was split, with roughly equal signals of satisfaction and frustration depending on context.
  • Active feature requests and positive competitor comparisons indicated genuine user engagement alongside the critical feedback.
Praise themeMentions
Good integrations32
Strong features28
Feature requests24
New releases23
Compared to rivals13
Complaint themeMentions
Bugs101
Reliability71
Missing features26
Lacking integrations26
Poor support7

Public discussion around xAI over the four-week window was heavily shaped by frustration, with bugs and reliability concerns accounting for a disproportionate share of all recorded mentions. Commenters surfaced a recurring pattern of integration failures, missing model availability, and API inconsistencies, suggesting that the product is being tested across a widening range of third-party tooling but is struggling to meet the expectations that come with that expanded surface area. Several mentions pointed specifically to issues at the API layer, including timeout mismatches, payload handling errors, and streaming failures, which framed much of the negative tone as technically granular rather than broadly dismissive.

Sentiment trajectory over the window tells a more complicated story than the headline score implies. Discussion began at modest levels with very low mention volumes, then climbed to a notably warmer peak in late May before collapsing sharply in early June as mention volume surged. That surge, concentrated across the two busiest weeks of the window, appeared to pull scores down and stabilize them at a subdued level, suggesting that broader or more mainstream engagement brought a less forgiving audience with it. The slight uptick in the most recent week may hint at early stabilization, though commenters did not appear fully satisfied.

On the more positive side, a meaningful thread of praise emerged around integrations that were working well and specific feature releases, with several mentions framing new capabilities favorably and drawing competitor comparisons that were not uniformly negative toward xAI. Feature requests were also active, which discussion suggested reflects genuine user investment rather than pure dissatisfaction.

Opinion was notably divided on integration quality, with integration-good and integration-lacking appearing almost equally weighted in the data, indicating that experience varied sharply depending on use case or toolchain. The gap between enthusiastic early adopters and users encountering reliability walls appeared to be a central fault line in the overall sentiment picture.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Total mentions analyzed (all time)
432
Mentions in selected period
227
Weeks in range
10
Pricing
Free tier; paid plans available
Sources
GitHub (227)

Compare with another tool

xAI

42

Trainual

88

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you xAI?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try xAI

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

DeepSeek logo

DeepSeek

58

Chinese AI lab offering open-weight large language models and a consumer chat interface for general-purpose use.

Compared to rivals
Compared to rivals

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details
Claude logo

Claude

56

Claude is a conversational AI assistant developed by Anthropic for individuals and businesses needing text-based AI support.

Strong features
AI quality

Free tier; paid plans available

View Details