xAI
xAI is an artificial intelligence company offering the Grok conversational AI assistant to general consumers and developers.
About this data
Updated June 29, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+7 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 444 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 16 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Community sentiment around xAI remained mixed over the recent period, with a pulse score of 44 showing only a slight uptick from before. The dominant thread in discussions was bugs and reliability problems, with commenters frequently flagging issues like missing model availability, streaming failures, and reasoning payload errors in various integrations. Some positive mentions praised integration possibilities and newer features, and several requests called for expanded platform support such as tracking prepaid tokens and adding Grok Build compatibility. Overall the tone skewed negative, driven heavily by technical frustrations.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How xAI compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in AI Chat.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 444 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 444 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“[Feature]: xai support for responses and native tools: x_search, web_search, code_exec. ## Summary I know this issues has been brought up multiple times before and PRs have been suggested but all have been shut down so far. Grok 4.1 Fast feels artificially handicapped as compared...”
“[Bug] Composer 2.5 model not available in xAI/Grok connection. ### Description Description When connecting to xAI/Grok in OpenCode, the **Composer 2.5** model does not appear in the model list after running /models. Steps to Reproduce 1. Run opencode to start the application 2. E...”
“[Bug]: xAI's online live search function is deprecated. ### Issue Checklist - [x] I understand that issues are for feedback and problem solving, not for complaining in the comment section, and will provide as much information as possible to help solve the problem. - [x] My issue ...”
“[Bug] Client specified an invalid argument with grok-code-fast-1 model via GitHub Copilot. # [Bug] Client specified an invalid argument with grok-code-fast-1 model via GitHub Copilot Summary OpenCode fails with AI_APICallError: Client specified an invalid argument when using the ...”
“Feature request: native xAI Grok Voice Agent API support in voice-call realtime. # Feature request: native xAI Grok Voice Agent API support in voice-call realtime Summary xAI shipped the **Grok Voice Agent API** in December 2025 (announcement: ). It is positioned as OpenAI-Realti...”
455+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- Bug reports and reliability concerns dominated discussion volume by a wide margin, setting a frustrated overall tone.
- Sentiment spiked in late May then dropped sharply in early June as public attention surged, with only a partial and tentative recovery since.
- Integration experience divided commenters most clearly, appearing as both a leading source of praise and a significant complaint theme.
- Feature requests and acknowledgment of new releases suggested some users remain actively engaged despite prevailing frustrations.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Strong features | 49 |
| Good integrations | 48 |
| Feature requests | 40 |
| New releases | 35 |
| Compared to rivals | 20 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| Bugs | 210 |
| Reliability | 111 |
| Missing features | 57 |
| Lacking integrations | 52 |
| Privacy concerns | 14 |
Public discussion around xAI over the four-week window was heavily shaped by frustration, with bug reports and reliability concerns far outpacing praise in raw volume. Commenters filing bug reports accounted for the single largest theme cluster, and reliability concerns followed closely behind, together suggesting that a core segment of users found day-to-day stability to be the most pressing issue. Sample mentions reinforced this picture, with multiple threads describing specific integration failures, payload handling errors, and timeout mismatches that left workflows broken or unpredictable.
The score trajectory tells a story of volatility rather than steady decline or recovery. Sentiment opened the window in moderate territory, dipped, then spiked notably around late May before collapsing sharply in early June as mention volume surged dramatically. That surge, from single-digit weekly mentions into the sixties, appeared to drag sentiment downward, suggesting that broader attention brought proportionally more critical voices into the conversation. The following weeks showed a modest, tentative climb, but scores remained well below that late-May high point, and the most recent reading settled near the overall pulse score.
On the more positive side, commenters did surface genuine appreciation, particularly around integration experiences and specific feature behavior. Feature requests also appeared in meaningful numbers, which discussion suggested reflected some baseline engagement and investment in the product rather than purely transactional use. The presence of new feature release mentions indicated that product movement was being noticed.
Opinion was noticeably divided on integration specifically. Integration appeared both as a top praise theme and as a top complaint theme, pointing to inconsistent experiences across different use cases or environments. Several mentions touched on missing model availability and gaps between what the platform announced and what users could actually access, which appeared to fuel a portion of the skepticism. Support responsiveness drew limited but pointed criticism in a smaller subset of posts.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+7 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 444 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 16 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
xAI
41
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you xAI?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is xAI your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Mistral
Mistral AI provides open and commercial large language models and the Le Chat conversational assistant for developers and businesses.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsDeepSeek
Chinese AI lab offering open-weight large language models and a consumer chat interface for general-purpose use.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details