Grok
Conversational AI assistant developed by xAI, designed for question answering, analysis, and general chat use.
About this data
Updated August 3, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
No change over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 2,433 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 22 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Discussion around Grok over the recent period was heavily negative, with commenters raising significant concerns about AI quality, bugs, and privacy. A large share of mentions focused on controversies tied to the broader organization, including legal disputes and environmental complaints about infrastructure powering Grok's data center. Several commenters also criticized perceived bias in the AI's responses, while a smaller group offered praise around certain feature comparisons to competitors. Overall sentiment appeared to remain under pressure with no meaningful shift from prior periods.
Read the deeper analysisAI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
In the news
Recent coverage from reputable tech publications, updated daily. Headlines and links only, shown for context and separate from the sentiment score.

SpaceXAI launches Grok 4.5, its first built with Cursor's help
SpaceXAI has rolled out Grok 4.5, the first model it trained with Cursor.
Read at source
SpaceX's Grok 4.5 launches at half the price of rivals — here's why that could rattle Anthropic and OpenAI
Elon Musk's SpaceX released Grok 4.5 on Wednesday, the first artificial intelligence model the company has trained specifically for coding and autonomous agents — and the first tangible product of its...
Read at source
Lawsuit: Man used Grok to make 7K sex images of stepdaughter, then shot himself
More young girls sue X over Grok CSAM; X accused of shielding child predators.
Read at sourceSentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
How Grok compares
Pulse Score over the selected period versus the top tracked competitors in AI Chat.
Where the mentions come from
Share of the 2,433 relevant public mentions in the selected period, by source.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 2,433 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“Grok, my account should have $6,000,000. No, Grok, my account should have $6,000,000. No, Grok, my account should have $6,000,000. No, Grok, my account should have $6,000,000. No, Grok, my account should have $6,000,000. Thank you Grok.”
“Re: "Grok 5 Could be xAI's Biggest Breakthrough Yet...". I just uploaded a selfie I took and let Grok roast me in unhinged mode mode. Holy shit, it was savage, and honestly made a few good points. I'm not sure I'll ever leave the house again lol”
“the little groyper kids running the administration are spending hours a day getting grok to generate wink-wink-not-quite-nazi imagery and using it to rile up grandpa. trump likes fascist shit because he has no taste but this is basically the equivalent of tricking meemaw into pos...”
“Grok is now in the history manipulation business. And what more important history to distort at this moment than that of the 14th Amendment.”
“SpaceX-owned xAI, the developer of Grok, sued Minnesota AG to challenge a law coming into effect in the state that will ban "nudify" apps, use of these AI image generators to make non-consenting intimate images, aka AI deepfake porn of real people including minors. www.cnbc.com/2...”
2,803+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- AI quality complaints overwhelmed praise and drove the dominant tone of discussion across the full window.
- Sentiment was volatile and trended lower by the final weeks, with no sustained recovery taking hold.
- Privacy and data concerns were a recurring source of distrust, with several mentions describing users actively leaving platforms over the issue.
- Opinion was split on competitor comparisons, appearing in both top praise and top complaint themes, with no clear consensus on where Grok stood relative to rivals.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| AI quality | 270 |
| Strong features | 237 |
| Compared to rivals | 215 |
| New releases | 55 |
| Fair pricing | 31 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| AI quality | 698 |
| Bugs | 411 |
| Compared to rivals | 364 |
| Privacy concerns | 200 |
| Reliability | 192 |
Discussion about Grok over the four-week window was dominated by negative sentiment, with complaints outpacing praise by a wide margin across the 761 mentions tracked. The loudest theme by far was ai_quality, where complaint-side mentions dwarfed the praise-side count, suggesting that commenters who engaged with the product directly were broadly dissatisfied with its outputs. Bugs and privacy concerns formed a dense second tier of criticism, and sample mentions reflected the privacy thread vividly, with users describing decisions to delete their content from platforms over fears about data being used to train the model. Hallucination complaints added a further layer of distrust around output reliability.
The score trajectory tells a story of persistent instability rather than a clear directional trend. Scores opened in the low 40s across the first two weeks, then dropped sharply into the low 30s before recovering briefly, only to fall again to the lowest point in the window before another partial rebound. This oscillating pattern, with no sustained recovery, suggests that whatever positive moments emerged were quickly offset by new waves of criticism. The final weeks trended downward, leaving sentiment weaker at the close than at the open.
Beyond product experience, a substantial portion of discussion was shaped by external controversies linked to the company and its leadership. Sample mentions pointed to legal disputes, environmental complaints tied to infrastructure, and concerns about the model being configured to deflect criticism of its owner. These threads were not framed as feature debates but as ethical and reputational concerns, and they appeared to color how commenters interpreted even ordinary product interactions.
Opinion was noticeably divided on competitor comparisons, which appeared in both the top praise and top complaint themes. Some commenters used rival products as a benchmark to argue Grok fell short, while others cited the same comparisons favorably. Feature praise and a small cluster of positive notes around new releases and pricing offered pockets of goodwill, but these were heavily outweighed in volume and intensity by the critical themes that dominated the window.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
No change over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 2,433 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 22 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
Grok
35
Trainual
88
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you Grok?
Get a private enterprise dashboard for your product - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts. You can also respond to the data shown here.
Explore the enterprise dashboardAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Is Grok your product?
See everything behind this page - full history, every source, theme deep-dives, and weekly alerts - in a private enterprise dashboard.
Request early accessCompare with similar tools
Kimi
Kimi is an AI chat assistant developed by Moonshot AI, serving users who need conversational AI and long-context document processing.
Free tier; paid plans available
View DetailsMistral
Mistral AI provides open and commercial large language models and the Le Chat conversational assistant for developers and businesses.
Free tier; paid plans available
View Details