ChatGPT
ChatGPT is a conversational AI assistant developed by OpenAI for individuals and businesses seeking text-based AI interaction.
About this data
Updated June 8, 2026
Overall Pulse Score
+5 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 93 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 12 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Weekly Sentiment Trend
Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.
This week in public discussion
Discussion around ChatGPT over the recent period reflected a mild dip in sentiment, with commenters frequently praising its image generation capabilities, particularly the ability to produce transparent PNG files noted as useful for designers. Several mentions also highlighted strong AI quality in coding contexts, though complaints surfaced around content restrictions, with some users calling its moderation the most limiting among major competitors. Privacy concerns and frustration over unhelpful responses in specific situations also drew scattered negative attention from commenters.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Sentiment mix by week
How the tone of public discussion splits each week.
Most-discussed praise
Most-discussed complaints
Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.
Sample public mentions
Showing 5 of 93 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.
“Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". Claude also pushes back when necessary. Gpt just wants to please you, even if the information is wrong”
“Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". I'm on both. 20/mo plans. I contstantly run up against Claude limits in the middle of projects.. very little warning. then you have to wait for it to reset or transfer to another llm. This hardly ever happens ...”
“I found GitHub repositories that were spreading malware. I asked AI what I should do about it, but it gave me nothing useful. So I opened a discussion on GitHub. Someone replied. It was literally the exact same text the AI had given me. I called it out and the comment was deleted...”
“Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". Only gpt gives you more time for the money. Claude is good, but damn those time limit is really worth it?”
“Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". I keep both for now. I use ChatGPT as prep work since they don't really have token limits and then I use Claude for the finishing touch.”
101+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.
Get ProDeeper analysis
- AI quality and image generation capability dominated praise, but compliments were often framed through comparisons to competitors rather than standalone enthusiasm.
- Sentiment followed a volatile path over the window, dropping sharply in late April, recovering into mid-May, then softening again in the most recent weeks.
- Opinion was most divided around competitor value comparisons, with several commenters expressing genuine uncertainty about whether ChatGPT justified its place in their toolset.
- Complaints about content restrictions and feature gaps added a persistent critical thread that tempered the positive commentary throughout the period.
| Praise theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| AI quality | 19 |
| Strong features | 18 |
| Compared to rivals | 6 |
| Easy to use | 3 |
| Good integrations | 2 |
| Complaint theme | Mentions |
|---|---|
| AI quality | 16 |
| Bugs | 14 |
| Hallucinations | 9 |
| Reliability | 8 |
| Compared to rivals | 5 |
Public discussion around ChatGPT over the past four weeks carried a mixed but somewhat deflated tone, with the pulse score slipping from the prior period and sentiment moving in an uneven pattern throughout the window. Praise was present and genuine, but it sat alongside a steady undercurrent of skepticism and frustration that kept overall feeling from settling into positively confident territory.
AI quality drew the most appreciative commentary, with several mentions acknowledging ChatGPT's capabilities in image generation and coding as genuinely useful differentiators. Commenters in competitor-comparison threads often framed the product as the go-to choice for specific tasks like generating images with transparent backgrounds, which reads as a targeted but real form of affection. At the same time, this praise was frequently conditional and comparison-driven rather than enthusiastic on its own terms, suggesting respect more than excitement.
The score trajectory told a turbulent story. Sentiment dipped sharply in late April before recovering through mid-May into the low-to-mid sixties, only to slide again in the most recent weeks. Discussion volume was heaviest when sentiment was at its lowest, hinting that critical or unsettled commentary drove much of the early conversation. The later uptick coincided with lighter discussion volume, which may mean a smaller but more favorable slice of commenters dominated those periods.
Divided opinion showed up most clearly in competitor comparisons. Several mentions described users running multiple AI subscriptions simultaneously and still feeling genuinely uncertain about which offered the most value. Censorship concerns surfaced as a pointed complaint, with at least one commenter describing ChatGPT's content restrictions as the worst among its peers. Feature gaps, interface frustrations, and a mention touching on AI reliability for practical tasks added friction to the overall tone, leaving the discussion somewhere between cautious appreciation and restless dissatisfaction.
AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.
Member perspectives
Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.
Overall Pulse Score
+5 over this period
A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 93 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 12 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.
Data summary
Compare with another tool
ChatGPT
55
Linear
83
Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.
Are you ChatGPT?
If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.
Share feedbackAffiliate disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Compare with similar tools
Grok
Conversational AI assistant developed by xAI, designed for question answering, analysis, and general chat use.
Free tier; paid plans available
6 relevant mentions analyzed
View DetailsMistral
Mistral AI provides open and commercial large language models and the Le Chat conversational assistant for developers and businesses.
Free tier; paid plans available
16 relevant mentions analyzed
View Details