Back to AI Assistants
ChatGPT logo

ChatGPT

ChatGPT is a conversational AI assistant developed by OpenAI for individuals and businesses seeking text-based AI interaction.

Primary category: AI Assistants
About this data
This page reflects aggregated public online discussion, not statements of fact or our own opinion. Scores summarize the tone of relevant public mentions and carry the limitations described in our methodology. See how this is calculated.

Updated June 8, 2026

Overall Pulse Score

55
Pulse Score

+5 over this period

A 0-100 index summarizing the tone of 93 relevant public mentions gathered from public online communities across 12 weeks in the selected period. It measures online sentiment, not a rating of the product's quality.

Weekly Sentiment Trend

Pulse Score by week over the selected period. Each point is one complete week of mentions.

This week in public discussion

Discussion around ChatGPT over the recent period reflected a mild dip in sentiment, with commenters frequently praising its image generation capabilities, particularly the ability to produce transparent PNG files noted as useful for designers. Several mentions also highlighted strong AI quality in coding contexts, though complaints surfaced around content restrictions, with some users calling its moderation the most limiting among major competitors. Privacy concerns and frustration over unhelpful responses in specific situations also drew scattered negative attention from commenters.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Sentiment mix by week

How the tone of public discussion splits each week.

PositiveMixedNeutralNegative

Most-discussed praise

AI quality19
Strong features18
Compared to rivals6
Easy to use3
Good integrations2

Most-discussed complaints

AI quality16
Bugs14
Hallucinations9
Reliability8
Compared to rivals5

Themes across the selected period, with mention counts.

Sample public mentions

Showing 5 of 93 analyzed public mentions in this period, with links to the original source. We do not reproduce full threads.

Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". Claude also pushes back when necessary. Gpt just wants to please you, even if the information is wrong

youtubeApr 6, 2026

Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". I'm on both. 20/mo plans. I contstantly run up against Claude limits in the middle of projects.. very little warning. then you have to wait for it to reset or transfer to another llm. This hardly ever happens ...

youtubeApr 2, 2026

I found GitHub repositories that were spreading malware. I asked AI what I should do about it, but it gave me nothing useful. So I opened a discussion on GitHub. Someone replied. It was literally the exact same text the AI had given me. I called it out and the comment was deleted...

Hacker NewsMay 21, 2026

Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". Only gpt gives you more time for the money. Claude is good, but damn those time limit is really worth it?

youtubeApr 2, 2026

Re: "Why I Switched From ChatGPT to Claude (without losing anything)". I keep both for now. I use ChatGPT as prep work since they don't really have token limits and then I use Claude for the finishing touch.

youtubeApr 3, 2026

101+ more analyzed mentions, full history, and theme breakdowns are part of Pro.

Get Pro

Deeper analysis

  • AI quality and image generation capability dominated praise, but compliments were often framed through comparisons to competitors rather than standalone enthusiasm.
  • Sentiment followed a volatile path over the window, dropping sharply in late April, recovering into mid-May, then softening again in the most recent weeks.
  • Opinion was most divided around competitor value comparisons, with several commenters expressing genuine uncertainty about whether ChatGPT justified its place in their toolset.
  • Complaints about content restrictions and feature gaps added a persistent critical thread that tempered the positive commentary throughout the period.
Praise themeMentions
AI quality19
Strong features18
Compared to rivals6
Easy to use3
Good integrations2
Complaint themeMentions
AI quality16
Bugs14
Hallucinations9
Reliability8
Compared to rivals5

Public discussion around ChatGPT over the past four weeks carried a mixed but somewhat deflated tone, with the pulse score slipping from the prior period and sentiment moving in an uneven pattern throughout the window. Praise was present and genuine, but it sat alongside a steady undercurrent of skepticism and frustration that kept overall feeling from settling into positively confident territory.

AI quality drew the most appreciative commentary, with several mentions acknowledging ChatGPT's capabilities in image generation and coding as genuinely useful differentiators. Commenters in competitor-comparison threads often framed the product as the go-to choice for specific tasks like generating images with transparent backgrounds, which reads as a targeted but real form of affection. At the same time, this praise was frequently conditional and comparison-driven rather than enthusiastic on its own terms, suggesting respect more than excitement.

The score trajectory told a turbulent story. Sentiment dipped sharply in late April before recovering through mid-May into the low-to-mid sixties, only to slide again in the most recent weeks. Discussion volume was heaviest when sentiment was at its lowest, hinting that critical or unsettled commentary drove much of the early conversation. The later uptick coincided with lighter discussion volume, which may mean a smaller but more favorable slice of commenters dominated those periods.

Divided opinion showed up most clearly in competitor comparisons. Several mentions described users running multiple AI subscriptions simultaneously and still feeling genuinely uncertain about which offered the most value. Censorship concerns surfaced as a pointed complaint, with at least one commenter describing ChatGPT's content restrictions as the worst among its peers. Feature gaps, interface frustrations, and a mention touching on AI reliability for practical tasks added friction to the overall tone, leaving the discussion somewhere between cautious appreciation and restless dissatisfaction.

AI-generated summary of public online discussion during this period. It reflects the tone of that discussion, not facts about the product or our views.

Member perspectives

Individual opinions from Pro members, posted over time. These are personal member views, not aggregated sentiment data.

Data summary

Relevant mentions analyzed
93
Weeks in range
12
Pricing
Free / Pro from $20/mo
Sources
Hacker News (93)

Compare with another tool

ChatGPT

55

Linear

83

Full comparison

Score-level preview from live weekly tracking.

Are you ChatGPT?

If you represent this product, you can share context about the data shown here. We read every submission.

Share feedback

Try ChatGPT

Visit the official website to get started

Visit site

Affiliate disclosure

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click one and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.

Compare with similar tools

Grok logo

Grok

64

Conversational AI assistant developed by xAI, designed for question answering, analysis, and general chat use.

Compared to rivals
Missing features

Free tier; paid plans available

6 relevant mentions analyzed

View Details
Mistral logo

Mistral

63

Mistral AI provides open and commercial large language models and the Le Chat conversational assistant for developers and businesses.

Strong features
Hallucinations

Free tier; paid plans available

16 relevant mentions analyzed

View Details